The Disaster-Free Upgrade to Mac OS X
by Derrick Story05/01/2001
This is a note to you, the PowerBook and iBook owner who is contemplating an upgrade to Mac OS X but hasn't taken the leap yet. The point of the letter isn't to convince you to upgrade; it's to show you how to do so without dropping a stitch or sending your computing life into personal hell. In fact, if you follow my procedure, you'll have the best of both OS worlds.
Why focus on laptops? Well, as good as Mac OS X is on a desktop Mac, it's even better on a PowerBook or iBook. As you'll see in my "Wows!" list later in the article, at this point Mac OS X has more advantages for computing on the go -- especially in wireless environments.
Are you tempted? Then read on ...
I know you need your laptop. It's not a toy; it's a tool (at least that's what you tell your spouse every time you buy a new one). So you can't afford to go off and have some wild OS fling just for the fun of it. If you're going to upgrade, then it has to work.
|
Related Reading
|
Fair enough, that's the way I feel too. But if you want to upgrade with complete confidence, it's going to cost you. Here's what I recommend you need:
- An AirPort-enabled laptop. Computers without an AirPort slot don't count because you'll need drivers for third-party cards that are hard to find or that don't exist.
- An external USB or FireWire drive to back up the current contents of your Mac. If you simply don't have one, or can't borrow one, then the painful alternative is to burn CDs -- but in my case, that would have meant I needed to burn 20 CDRs to completely back up my PowerBook. No thanks.
- More RAM. I recommend at least 192 MB of RAM -- more if you can afford it.
- A 10-GB internal hard drive (minimum); 20-GB hard drive (recommended).
- Upgrades to Mac OS X and QuickTime 5.0
- AirPort Base Station, or Mac running AirPort Software Base Station.
Bottom line, you're going to have to spend some money to upgrade. I spent $130 for the software and $170 for a new 20-GB IBM hard drive for my PowerBook. My original drive was only 6 GB, and that wasn't going to cut it for this failsafe system of upgrading.
This leads to my only real reason why a laptop owner shouldn't upgrade right now to Mac OS X: money. If it isn't in your budget (and I know all about that one being a writer for a living), then wait. Because the honest truth is, to set-up a disaster-free upgrade, it's going to cost you a few dollars.
Game plan for the disaster-free upgrade
If you've made it this far in the article and are still interested in upgrading, then you're in for a real treat. Because upgrading to Mac OS X has been one of my most satisfying projects in a long time. Here are the basic steps we're going to follow:
- Back-up the entire contents of your existing laptop hard-drive on to an external drive.
- Wipe your internal notebook drive and partition it into two partitions.
- Install Mac OS X on one partition, and copy the entire contents of your existing drive on the other partition.
The end result is you'll have two drives appear on your Mac OS X desktop. One is the exhilarating new operating system with all its bells and whistles, and the other is your previous drive that has everything you need for day-to-day life. You can choose which drive to boot from at any time.
When you boot from your OS 9.1 drive, your computer will appear exactly the way it did before the upgrade. The only thing that will change is that it will run better because the new drivers seem to enhance performance.
|
Related Articles: The Disaster-Free Upgrade to Mac OS X -- Part 2 |
|
|
Then, when you want to have fun (which is about 90 percent of the time for me), simply boot from the Mac OS X drive. By the way, fun doesn't mean lack of productivity.
I'm writing this article in BBEdit 6.1 on my PowerBook, running Mac OS X 10.0.3 connected to the Internet via AirPort with music playing from iTunes. In fact, Apple has provided me with the following Mac OS X applications free in my iDisk software folder (as they do every iDisk owner): iTunes, iMovie, AIM, BBEDit, Fetch, GraphicConverter, Adobe Acrobat, REALBasic, and StoneStudio. This is in addition to the already included IE5, e-mail, QuickTime (non-pro version), Chess, and a handful of utilities.
Last night, running Mac OS X, I effortlessly checked my e-mail, browsed the Web, chatted online with friends, wrote an article, and uploaded it to a web site. Fun doesn't mean wasting time ... (remember the "tools not toys" argument I mentioned earlier?).
OS X "wows!" and "bow-wows!"
Before going any further, I want to take a moment and share with you five of my Mac OS X "Wows!" and five "Bow-Wows!" so you'll have some idea of what you're getting into.
Mac OS X wows!
- Instant awake from sleep on PowerBooks and iBooks. Seems like a small thing, but gosh I love it, especially at work.
- iTunes -- this is the coolest application. On my AirPort-connected PowerBook, I have access to dozens of radio stations from A to Z, not to mention my own MP3 collection. I can listen to any type of music anytime I want just about anywhere.
- Integrated iDisk -- it is now part of your system, and I access my iDisk at least a couple times a day. What's really fun now is that Apple places goodies in there for me to use with Mac OS X.
- PDF files from web pages -- I can now save any web page as a PDF file complete with graphics. I can e-mail it to folks on other platforms, post them on my web site (with permission of course!), or save them as archives. It's really easy.
- Internet connectivity -- I use AirPort for 90 percent of my connectivity, so I've set AirPort as my first choice with dial-up and Ethernet following. Now, when I awaken my PowerBook in a new location, it automatically finds the AirPort connection. Real handy.
Mac OS X bow-wows!
- I still can't find things! For example: Where's the ScrapBook?!
- Some applications run slower. I can already tell that I much prefer Cocoa apps to Carbonized ones.
- It's expensive to upgrade the right way. After buying the OS itself, there's another $30 for QT pro, more RAM, and bigger drives. Ouch!
- I'm having a hard time getting my OS X Mac to communicate with my OS 9.1 Macs. The Internet connection is great, but computer-to-computer connection still requires too much fooling around.
What's next?
So, after reading these pros and cons, if you've decided you're ready to make the leap, here's what to do. Figure out the equipment that you need to buy, beg, or borrow, and wrestle with your budget. Place your upgrade orders, and while you're waiting for things to arrive (if you don't have an Apple store in your neighborhood, that is), get out your calendar and set aside some time to work on this project.
Then stop back by the Mac DevCenter for part two of this article where I provide step-by-step instructions for disaster-free upgrading. It's really easy -- I promise.
Derrick Story is the author of The Photoshop CS4 Companion for Photographers, The Digital Photography Companion, and Digital Photography Hacks, and coauthor of iPhoto: The Missing Manual, with David Pogue. You can follow him on Twitter or visit www.thedigitalstory.com.
Return to the Mac DevCenter.
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a talkback.
Showing messages 1 through 29 of 29.
-
Airport-enabled - I wish
2001-05-01 20:50:13 dogzilla [Reply | View]
Well, I wish I had a Powerbook with an airport slot. I have a Wallstreet with a wavelan card, which I find indispensable under OS9. And this machine still has quite a lot of legs, so I can't really justify an upgrade (either to myself *or* my spouse). I just wish the Wavelan people would release the drivers already. I've heard that the holdup was Apple's incomplete IOKit, and have also heard a bit about possible open source drivers, but nothing concrete yet. Anyone care to comment? Lack of Wavelan support is the only thing holding me back from OSX full-time. -
Airport-enabled - I wish
2001-05-01 22:08:38 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Indeed you have a terrific PowerBook, and there aren't any drivers that I know of for the WaveLan card. If someone knows of a workaround, please chime in. In the meantime, I agree, I'd wait to upgrade too. -
Airport-enabled - I wish
2001-05-10 10:23:54 uchinan [Reply | View]
Is your card a Lucent card? I have a Lucent Orinoco PCMCIA wireless card (formerly wavelan, I think)
It uses Apple's Airports drivers. The airport software actually sees it as an airport card. The only reason it doesn't work with OS X yet is because OS X has no PCMCIA card support yet. It should work fine though as soon as PC card support is added. I have a Lombard 400 320mb RAM
-
10.0.2 fixes some performance issues
2001-05-01 23:53:24 James Duncan Davidson |
[Reply | View]
I just grabbed the 10.0.2 update from Software Update. Lots of things seem to be running somewhat faster. App launch times seem to be down by a few "bounces" of their icon. As well, the Finder is much quicker. From the change in my hard drive noises it seems to be caching information instead of grinding on each folder open.
The trick to getting 9.1 and X talking, at least for me, was to make sure that File Sharing was enabled over TCP/IP. The checkbox on the 9.1 file sharing panel seems to be disabled by default -- and OS X doesn't do AppleTalk for anything but printers now.
-
10.0.2 fixes some performance issues
2001-05-02 07:11:16 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I'm glad you brought up the 10.0.2 build. Software Update also had a new version of iTunes and Epson Printer Drivers. Everything went smoothly -- just hit the button and go grab a Coke. The update application handles the download and the installation. You do have to restart afterward, however.
I also give this update a thumbs up in terms of performance improvement, so I encourage folks to go get it.
-
But.... what's it really like?
2001-05-02 11:43:51 pisej5 [Reply | View]
Having the "Lombard" vintage of a G3 PowerBook with iTunes already installed and an Acrobat license, I'm left with wow #1 to convince me of doing the upgrade. But I would have liked to know performance is compared to running OS 9.1: Is there more disk activity, which to me is a significant issue, given the rather slow disks in this type of PowerBook? Does it take forever to launch an application? On my B/W G3 everything runs ever so slowly, launching apps takes forever, response times for mouse clicks are measured in seconds and the disk churns endlessly (it's a 6 GB disk and we have 192 MB RAM to waddle in). It is very much reminiscent of the situation 10 years ago, switching from System 6 to System 7 - everything slowed perceptibly down, the API doubled in complexity and most of the promised functionality very poorly implemented (publish and subscribe, remember that, eh?). I know this sounds morosely, but you have to make a better case for upgrading if you want to convince me. As you state, ones PowerBook is not a toy and unless I get real productivity gains, I'll hold back.
Piet. -
But.... what's it really like?
2001-05-02 13:22:57 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I think your points are excellent. The decision isn't really whether or not to upgrade; rather, to upgrade now or later.
I think you have built a good argument to upgrade later. Why do I say that?
1) The speed, if anything, is a bit slower on Mac OS X right now -- especially on older machines. But that will change.
2) You don't have AirPort.
3) Chances are your hard drive is too small to partition it to maintain two complete OSs and their associated apps, and you probably don't want to invest in a new drive for an older machine -- no dis on your Lombard; they are great!
4) Most likely you would spend most of your time in the OS 9 partition anyway, based on how you described the way you use your PowerBook.
So, looks to me like your decision to sit tight for a bit is a good one. It will be harder to do so, however, later this year when we see more refined versions of Mac OS X and lots more apps to run on it.
You might want to start budgeting now ...
-
fast wake from sleep....
2001-05-02 13:31:38 gyoungs [Reply | View]
...and it also drains the battery FAST too. that's 'cause it isn't really sleeping, just eyes closed, but wide awake (and draining that portable must have). So shut it down when you're on the road - or else.
gregory -
fast wake from sleep....
2001-05-04 16:12:27 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
MacFixIt has a pretty good thread going on this very subject. I'm currently testing the "second battery instead of the DVD drive" theory that some folks say helps. More to report.
-
Kudos
2001-05-04 02:44:43 firetear [Reply | View]
On writing one of the better short pieces for MacOS X I have read. Your attitude was positive, and you were helpful and honest- even about flaws. Unfortunately for now I too fall in the category of 'upgrade later'. But then, I'm waiting to buy a Ti with OS X pre-installed;)
I've only really started reading Mac Dev articles here, I hope they're all as well written as yours.
-
My Titan with X is rock & roll
2001-05-10 02:42:39 ives [Reply | View]
G4 PowerBook Titan an OS X I have. I can tell it's the coolest thing I ever had. I'm siting in a caffee an have my Titan on the table and the peoble they walk by can't ignore my Titan. It's fantastic.
I'm a guy from switzerland an here not many people have the new Titan.
All thouse who have one go out and have fun. -
My Titan with X is rock & roll
2001-05-10 11:11:52 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Now be honest, are you using your Titan to try to meet women?
-
400MHz PB - Slow finder
2001-05-10 08:11:30 pcacace [Reply | View]
It seems even with 10.0.2 and 576MB RAM that the finder is sluggish and unresponsive on this PowerBook. Yet every other feature works as advertised. I can honestly say that I have not had a single problem since upgrading.
The speed issue can be easily overlooked when working exclusively on one machine - but after switching between OS 9.1 and Windows 98 (*groan*) throughout the day, it is clear that X (on this machine) can't perform in a real work environment yet.
Can this speed isssue be the difference between the G3 and G4?
-
400MHz PB - Slow finder
2001-05-10 11:10:41 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Seems to me that some people are more sensitive to speed differences than others. But I think at this point, Mac OS X is slower than what you're used to on Windows and OS 9.
What I've done to help with this (I hate slow computers too!)is much like what I used to do in the early PowerPC days.
Turn off everything I don't need such as File Sharing, AppleTalk, and even Classic when possible. I keep my open application load to a minimum (even though it sounds like you have plenty of RAM). You can easily close apps right from the Dock by holding down the CTRL key and clicking on them.
The other thing that I've noticed that really affects performance is my networking configuration. On my PowerBook, I'm constantly switching between Airport networks with different TCP/IP configs.
I had noticed that things were really slowing down when I switched from one environment to another. So I changed my set-up from using "Automatic" in the "Location" option in the Network System Prefs to creating specific Locations with unique settings.
After I did that, overall performance improved.
Don't know if any of these tips are useful to you. Maybe someone else has something to share. -
400MHz PB - Slow finder
2001-05-10 13:52:49 pcacace [Reply | View]
Thanks for some good suggestions - I try to keep the system as lean as possible as well.
So far the just-released 10.0.3 has made the Finder much faster - especially in column view. There is a noticeable difference that I did not see with 10.0.2. Hopefully each update will push OS X performance even further.
-
Classic is the real problem
2001-05-10 13:34:04 jthwaites [Reply | View]
MS Office 2001 suddenly stops saving in Classic, various drivers can't load etc.
A point for you to stress is that you shouldn't rely on Classic (although I think it performs OK) - we can't move to pure OS X quickly enough for me!
The dual-boot is the best interim solution - that's what I've done, too.
-
My experiences
2001-05-10 16:34:53 louis2907 [Reply | View]
I must have installed X at least 6 times, then I decided to install on the first partition instead of the second, on my 20 gig drive, I started getting good results but when I was running classic some things were changing, like the aliases in my favorites folder kept changing for the actual application, so I decided to install 9.1 on the same partition as X and so far the results are good.I also updated to 10.0.3 so far so good.
Powerbook firewire G3 500 mhz 20 gig 384 megs
-
No ethernet?!
2001-05-11 05:30:44 gadget [Reply | View]
Hi,
I read dis article and I wondered if OS X doesn't support my Ethernet-Connections to the Net, cos it was written like just Airport works fine. I have to know before I update, cos otherwise I couldn't access any xternals anymore...
And also: how much Space do I need for the OS x PArtition on my HD?!
Gadget
-
Titan PB PC Card Slot and OS X
2001-05-12 17:39:25 mmmiles [Reply | View]
Any news on MacOS X compatability with PC Cards? I have a Novatel Ricochet PC Card Modem that works fine with OS 9 but it's not recognized by OS X.
-
About Bow-wow number four...
2001-05-14 07:39:50 macfandave [Reply | View]
Try this:
On your OS X Mac, go to the System Preferences and choose Sharing. Then click on "Allow FTP Sharing" to enable it. Make a note of the IP address in the bottom section.
Now, go to your 9.1 Mac and fire up Vicomsoft FTP Client or Fetch and Connect to the OS X Mac using the IP address as the host and your "OS X" username and password.
You can now move files between the computers MUCH faster than you could using AppleShare. I hope your results are as good as mine.
Dave
-
WaveLAN/Orinocco card
2001-05-25 04:38:56 simonforster [Reply | View]
Having read the glowing report of OS X on an Airport enabled PowerBook I decided that I'd install OS X on my main work machine - also a PowerBook. Bought the new hard drive. Installed it. Installed OS X.
And it's useless to me.
My PowerBook is a bronze one with a WaveLAN/Orinocco card. All my network connections are wireless. I know now that PCMCIA WaveLAN cards are not supported under OS X's Airport install - so OS X is useless to me.
Every time I've tried to use OS X in a working environment, I get caught out by lack of drivers, incomplete support for something or just a lack of applications.
Soooo, frustrating. -
WaveLAN/Orinocco card
2001-05-25 07:01:28 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I'm sorry for your frustration, but if it was my article that you read, then you missed a key element. The very first bullet point of Disaster-Free Part 1 is:
"Here's what I recommend you need:
An AirPort-enabled laptop. Computers without an AirPort slot don't count because you'll need drivers for third-party cards that are hard to find or that don't exist. "
-
Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix Users
2002-09-18 02:00:56 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Apple laptops are effectively unusable for unix users.
I am a long-time Unix user. That means I need to have the Ctrl key to the left of the A key. This is a genuine need, not merely a want; it is based upon ergonomics. The Ctrl key is heavily used in unix, and it must be easily accessable. It cannot be off in the lower left corner of the keyboard where it is difficult to get at, and where it distorts the position of your left hand such that you can't easily type other keys while holding the Ctrl key down.
Apple desktop keyboards are now all USB. They are all OK. The CapsLock key can be re-mapped into a Ctrl key.
Unfortunately, even in this modern age, all Apple laptops have built-in ADB keyboards. The ADB keyboard is broken-by-design. It is, in general, not possible to remap the CapsLock key into a Ctrl key.
There are some exceptions, but they are horrible kludges. They are
horrible kludges because the original design of the ADB keyboard was a horrible kludge. The correct solution would be for Apple to re-design their laptop motherboards to use built-in USB keyboards. This hasn't happened yet. If you run Linux, use Debian's solution. For Mac OS X users, uControl works. There are no solutions (that I know of) for either NetBSD or OpenBSD. Please note once again that the "solutions" above are in fact kludges, because of the original bad design of the ADB keyboard.
Apple is (currently) ignoring Unix users! This is not merely speculation on my part. In an on-going email exchange I am having with an Apple employee (whom I won't name) in their marketing department, the Apple marketing person directly stated to me that Apple was catering to their historic Mac customers, and is purposely ignoring the Unix market. He also claimed that Apple would soon start paying more attention to the Unix market. I won't hold my breath. Apple has been ignoring Unix users for more than 10 years. I expect that trend to continue. (Also note that my Apple contact indicated that Macs would never ship with a 3-button mouse, even though Apple intended to port almost all X-window software and deliver it either on a CD/DVD or installed directly on each Mac's hard drive. How Unix friendly is a 1-button mouse with X programs that often require 3 buttons?)
Apple has now lost two opportunities to sell me hardware. I really wanted an Apple laptop for their superior battery life, and for the PowerPC with Altivec CPU. (The Altivec is vastly superior to the x86 line for DSP.) Because I can't live with the broken-by-design built-in ADB keyboard in all Apple laptops, Sony and IBM sold me laptops instead. If Apple fixes this problem, they will sell me a PowerBook next year; if they don't, I'll still be running OpenBSD on x86 hardware, and wishing I could use a Mac.






