A Week with the iPod
by James Duncan Davidson11/28/2001
The iPod seems to be the "must have" toy for the tech-set, and for good reason. It’s the first portable MP3 player to hold a good-sized music library that you can actually take anywhere.
Sure, the Creative Nomad was one of the first multi-gigabyte MP3 devices, but it was really too big to carry in your pocket. And the Nomad had three other strikes against it: slow transfer time, a user interface that was hard to use, and battery consumption that challenged the Energizer bunny. I played with one for a few hours and just couldn’t justify keeping it.
The iPod solves all of these problems with its reasonable size, Firewire interface, decent user interface, and long-lasting, built-in rechargeable battery. Apple did their homework and came up with a very good entry in their first digital-lifestyle device.
From outward appearances, it looked as if they had got everything right. So I took the plunge and bought one before going home for the Thanksgiving holidays to give it a spin. Along the way I found a lot to like about the iPod, and several things that need a bit of work.
Out of box experience: great
|
| |
| Post your opinion | |
True to Apple form, the iPod comes in a gorgeous package. Anybody picking up one of these off the shelf, or unwrapping it on Christmas morning, will sense the elegant minimalism of Apple’s design department.
The “out of box” experience that Apple has always done so well at with the Macintosh has been put to good use here. I had nothing but “oohs” and “ahhs” as I unpacked the various parts. The iPod itself was wrapped in a plastic wrapper with the words “Don’t Steal Music” written on it in several languages.
About thirty seconds after I had ripped off the plastic wrapper, I had plugged it into my PowerBook with the provided Firewire cord and was synching my iTunes library with it. No muss, no fuss. It just worked.
The 2.5 gigs of music that I carry on my laptop synched quickly and were done by the time I had walked to the kitchen for a beverage and back. I then plugged in the headphones and tried to listen. Unfortunately, as long as the iPod is hooked up to a computer, it cannot be used to play back music. I quickly pulled out the power adapter from the box and plugged in the iPod so that I could listen while it charged up for the first time.
User interface: almost perfect
|
Related Articles
Road Testing the PowerBook Ti 667 Mac OS X 10.1: The Real Mac OS X |
The user interface of the iPod is quite elegant indeed. The use of the original Macintosh “Chicago” font makes for a readable display and is a nice nod to Apple’s history. The scroll wheel is a very intuitive way to navigate the menus and to control the volume. At first, I thought it might be a bit confusing to use the same control for two different purposes, but I haven’t yet run into a case where it has been a problem. On-screen information is easy to read and the back light works very well.
Navigating your music collection is fairly easy. Almost every way that iTunes gives you to navigate your music is available. You can browse songs sorted by playlist, artist, or album. Browsing by playlist or artist is available from the main menu. Browsing by album can be accomplished by browsing by artist. In order to browse through all the albums in your collection you can browse by artist in the main menu, then select “all” artists. This little trick took me a day or so to figure out, but is the primary way I now browse through my collection.
One feature that iTunes provides, and which I use quite a bit, that isn’t present on the iPod is the ability to browse by genre. I listen to a wide variety of music and love to use shuffle play, but without the ability to play songs only from a specific genre of music, it is all to easy to have a mellow jazz track follow a really thumping techno track.
Form factor: elegant, but not rugged enough
The small size of the iPod lends itself to being stashed wherever you want. I’ve carried it in my hand, jacket, and even my jeans pocket without a problem. Like cell phones before it, I think that it would be nice if the iPod were smaller. If it were the size of the newest Rio-based devices, the form factor would be perfect. However, considering that the iPod stores a lot more music (5Gb vs. 128Mb), the size is ok. Just like the PowerBooks, I’m sure it will shrink over time.
One area in which Apple should have paid more attention is in the finishes used on the iPod. The glossy clear plastic front and shiny metal back are eye-catching and make for great pictures. However, in my use so far, the front plastic is starting to show a haze of super-fine scratches from being carried in pockets and rubbing against fabric. Similarly, the shiny metal back suffers from a multitude of fingerprints and fine scratches. For a device that is intended to be carried everywhere, I don’t expect it to stay in pristine condition for long, but it should wear better than it is so far.
Music playback: gaps between tracks
The quality of the music playback is first-rate, and the provided headphones are truly great. The only headphones that I have that are better than the iPod's are some closed-ear, over-the-head DJ-style headphones that are much more bulky. I found the iPod's headphones comfortable to wear; however, two members of my family found them to be too big. One size does not seem to fit all.
The one complaint I have about the iPod’s music playback is in the way that it behaves when changing tracks. Like iTunes, there is a slight pause between tracks. With pop music, where each song is a distinct entity, this isn’t a problem and you would never notice. However, I listen to quite a few “mix” albums – albums where the artist has seamlessly mixed each track into the next. With this kind of music, the gaps become noticeable and even annoying. Classical music lovers will also run into this, as many titles in that genre have pieces that span several tracks.
Luckily, this doesn’t have to be a show stopper for long. All Apple has to do is modify the software so that it plays tracks seamlessly with no pause. WinAmp and other software-based MP3 players have been doing this for years, so it shouldn’t be much of a problem to fix. Hopefully, if Apple fixes this, they’ll also fix this behavior in iTunes.
FireWire disk mode: look ma! it’s a portable hard drive
|
Related Reading
|
One thing that separates the iPod from all other MP3 players is that it can behave as a FireWire-based hard drive, enabling the easy transport of files from computer to computer. To mount the iPod as a hard drive under Mac OS X requires a simple selection in iTunes. Once mounted, the iPod acts as a decent-speed hard drive. It’s not nearly as fast as an internal hard drive, but I was able to copy 50 Megs of data in under 30 seconds. Not too bad for when you need a few gigs to carry some data without a computer.
Bottom line: good for a 1.0 product, looking for the 1.1
The bottom line is that I like my iPod quite a bit. In fact, I’m keeping mine and not letting it go back. The team at Apple that designed the iPod should be very proud of what they have accomplished.
I’m a bit hesitant that it will scratch more as I use it, but thankfully all my other complaints can be fixed with a software update. And the only thing I really want fixed ASAP is the track gap issue. When one track of a mix album blends seamlessly into the next, I will be in MP3 nirvana.
My Rating: 8 out of 10. I’ll give it a 9 out of 10 if the track gap issue goes away. And, if the next rev of the iPod also comes with a more durable finish, then it can score a perfect 10.
James Duncan Davidson is a freelance author, software developer, and consultant focusing on Mac OS X, Java, XML, and open source technologies. He currently resides in San Francisco, California.
Return to the Mac DevCenter.
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a talkback.
Showing messages 1 through 20 of 20.
-
Predecessors
2001-11-29 08:11:44 Marc Hedlund |
[Reply | View]
-
iTunes and Gaps between songs
2001-11-29 16:15:07 boondoggle [Reply | View]
iTunes allows for less of a gap between songs by useing the crossfade playback under the Effects preferences. -
iTunes and Gaps between songs
2001-11-29 17:59:20 James Duncan Davidson |
[Reply | View]
It's true that the new crossfade playback helps reduce the gap. But the gap is either still there, or there is a minimum 1 second fade between tracks. On a mix disc, that 1 second fade can sound really bad. And of course, this feature is only available on iTunes and not hte iPod.
Another reader has pointed out in private mail that this problem may be caused by iTunes inserting a small space at the end of tracks as it rips them from CD. I haven't yet looked into this but will over the next few days. -
iTunes and Gaps between songs
2001-11-30 09:27:31 digi-native [Reply | View]
In iTunes 2.0.2's Preferences (CD Burning tab), you can set the gap between songs from 0-5 seconds. -
iTunes and Gaps between songs
2001-12-04 13:52:53 James Duncan Davidson |
[Reply | View]
Right, but that only affects burning of discs. In every case, no matter what settings I tweak, when I import a mix disc, I get gaps in the tracks. This very well may be something that iTunes does on import and that the playback gaps are due to this. I'm still chasing this down.
-
No Comparison for iPod
2001-11-30 09:23:24 digi-native [Reply | View]
After several months of dealing with the poor battery performance, lousy interface, and flaky operation of an Archos Jukebox 6000, Apple's iPod is a breath of fresh air! It's an awesome little music player.
Regarding one of the reviewers complaints:
> One feature that iTunes provides, and which
> I use quite a bit, that isn’t present on the
> iPod is the ability to browse by genre.
I get around this problem by creating genre playlists in iTunes, and then when I want to listen to a specific genre of music, I use the appropriate playlist. Works great!
-
Are other audio formats supported?
2001-11-30 11:14:58 eberg [Reply | View]
Can you play back anything other than MP3 with the iPod? And does it/will it be supported under Linux (or, forgive me for asking, Win_whatever)?
-
Large file size bug.
2001-12-11 09:50:11 babymac [Reply | View]
The iPod currently has a bug that causes its internal hard drive to spin for the entire duration of large (over 22 MB) audio files. This puts excessive wear on the drive and significantly decreases battery life.
Normally, the hard drive should only spin for about 15 seconds every 20 minutes. Forget about the gap between tracks...this bug seems far more urgent. Apple please fix it!
CTP
http://members.home.net/babymac/ -
Large file size bug.
2001-12-14 23:05:30 James Duncan Davidson |
[Reply | View]
Wow. That is a bad bug. And I just checked on mine and it does the same thing. That might explain my weblog about iPod battery life.
Have you reported it to Apple via their online forms?
http://bugreport.apple.com/
-
Transferring music from ipod to Mac
2002-09-12 01:18:16 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Is it possible to transfer music from my ipod to my Mac? I have a number of Macs which I'd like to keep up-to-date with my music collection. Haven't worked out how to do this yet.
-
ipod to mac solution
2002-09-19 16:11:00 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
try this program:
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/7546
It updates your iTunes with what's on your ipod instead of vice-versa.
-
Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix Users
2002-10-09 23:48:06 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Apple laptops are effectively unusable for unix users.
I am a long-time Unix user. That means I need to have the Ctrl key to the left of the A key. This is a genuine need, not merely a want; it is based upon ergonomics. The Ctrl key is heavily used in unix, and it must be easily accessable. It cannot be off in the lower left corner of the keyboard where it is difficult to get at, and where it distorts the position of your left hand such that you can't easily type other keys while holding the Ctrl key down.
Apple desktop keyboards are now all USB. They are all OK. The CapsLock key can be re-mapped into a Ctrl key.
Unfortunately, even in this modern age, all Apple laptops have built-in ADB keyboards. The ADB keyboard is broken-by-design. It is, in general, not possible to remap the CapsLock key into a Ctrl key.
There are some exceptions, but they are horrible kludges. They are
horrible kludges because the original design of the ADB keyboard was a horrible kludge. The correct solution would be for Apple to re-design their laptop motherboards to use built-in USB keyboards. This hasn't happened yet. If you run Linux, use Debian's solution. For Mac OS X users, uControl works. There are no solutions (that I know of) for either NetBSD or OpenBSD. Please note once again that the "solutions" above are in fact kludges, because of the original bad design of the ADB keyboard.
Apple is (currently) ignoring Unix users! This is not merely speculation on my part. In an on-going email exchange I am having with an Apple employee (whom I won't name) in their marketing department, the Apple marketing person directly stated to me that Apple was catering to their historic Mac customers, and is purposely ignoring the Unix market. He also claimed that Apple would soon start paying more attention to the Unix market. I won't hold my breath. Apple has been ignoring Unix users for more than 12 years. I expect that trend to continue. (Also note that my Apple contact indicated that Macs would never ship with a 3-button mouse, even though Apple intended to port almost all X-window software and deliver it either on a CD/DVD or installed directly on each Mac's hard drive. How Unix friendly is a 1-button mouse with X programs that often require 3 buttons?)
Apple has now lost two opportunities to sell me hardware. I really wanted an Apple laptop for their superior battery life, and for the PowerPC with Altivec CPU. (The Altivec is vastly superior to the x86 line for DSP.) Because I can't live with the broken-by-design built-in ADB keyboard in all Apple laptops, Sony and IBM sold me laptops instead. If Apple fixes this problem, they will sell me a PowerBook next year; if they don't, I'll still be running OpenBSD on x86 hardware, and wishing I could use a Mac.
-
Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix Users
2003-09-14 08:20:17 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I'm getting pretty sick of seeing this post everywhere. Two things to note;
- This is an iPOD REVIEW. So guess what the comments should be about?
- If you're going to rant, at least do your research first. Post that thread on a technical Mac site and watch yourself get torn to pieces.
Can't the editor delete this?
Matt
-
between song gaps
2003-02-08 20:05:33 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
you can fix this in iTunes. import the songs as one big song. under "advanced" on the file menu, highlight all the songs you want, and then click Join CD Tracks. that should do the trick for all those "concept" albums out there. the iPod IS pretty scratch prone. I love mine!
-
Best home theater system interface?
2007-01-03 09:55:08 Hi-Tech [Reply | View]
If anyone has thoughts or suggestions on the best way to interface an iPod to a home theater system please use the contact form at my Home Theater (http://www.home-theater-systems-advice.com/) site and let me know so I can pass the info along to my readers. Thanks!







That said, the UI is pretty clunky (you can try it out in the Java applet emulator) relative to the iPod, and USB is really slow for transferring 20G of MP3's. The device is also significantly bigger than an iPod (though smaller than a Nomad). They have solved the "gaps between songs" problem, though.