Inside iPhoto: Image Management for Power Shooters
Pages: 1, 2
Exporting Options and Tips
You have so many options for outputting your images in iPhoto it's hard to list them all. As I've mentioned earlier, you can order Kodak prints, create an archival picture book, or quickly pull together a full-screen slide show, complete with background music.
But there's more. If you hit the Share button, you'll see an Export option that gives you three additional options:
- File Export: particularly handy for creating smaller-size pictures for sending via email.
- Web Page: automatically generates a thumbnail-driven Web page that you can serve directly from your Mac OS X computer using the built-in Apache Web server.
- QuickTime: generates a QuickTime slide show for posting on the Web or for burning onto a CD.
These functions work best if you've created a specific collection of pictures in what iPhoto calls an "Album." To create a new album, go to File --> New Album, or hit CMD N. You can also hit the "+" button in the lower left corner of the interface. Then name your album and simply drag pictures from your main Photo Library into it. The photos you place in the album are not removed from your master library; rather, they are copied to the album.
Now that you have a new subset of pictures in the album, you can make a book, create a QuickTime movie, or generate a Web page.
I don't care much for the QuickTime generator because it doesn't allow me to add transitions or background music. I much prefer LiveSlideShow 2.0 by Totally Hip Software because I can easily create sophisticated QuickTime presentations with it.
But I do think that the Web page export function is handy. The code it generates is pretty clean, and if you add a few lines of your own code to it, you can quickly create a professional-looking picture page directly from iPhoto.
I like to have metadata on all my Web pages, plus my logo, contact information, and links to my home site. So I keep that "template code" on Stickies (the electronic Mac version) and simply paste it into the HTML that iPhoto generates. By doing so, I can create a custom Web page of photos in just a few minutes.
For example, if I replace the first few lines of code that iPhoto generates with something like this:
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>Story Photography: Wedding Album</title>
<meta name="Story Photography" content="Story Photography, Derrick Story,
digital photography, weddings, wedding photography,
portraits, landscape, multimedia, QuickTime, Photoshop,
digital cameras, handhelds, PDAs, mobile computing,
Sonoma County, San Francisco, technology, conferences">
</head>
<body>
<p><center><a href="http://www.storyphoto.com">
<img height="104" width="255" src="images/storyphoto_header.jpg"
border="0" alt="Story Photography Since 1997"></a></center></p>
<p><center>
<img height="9" width="428" src="images/line_rule.gif" border="0">
<center>
<h2><font face="Arial, Helvetica" color=#000000>Wedding Album
</font></h2>
</center>
then I add this markup at the end of the document:
<hr color=#1A28A3>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=2 color=#000000>
Photos © 2002 Story Photography<br />
Derrick Story, owner<br />
dstory@storyphoto.com --
<a href="http://www.storyphoto.com">www.storyphoto.com</a> --
(707) 546-8322</font>
I have a custom iPhoto Web page that looks like the sample below. Easy!
Final Thoughts
iPhoto is a Mac OS X application only, and I think it will inspire many to make the move to Apple's new operating system. Since I've been using it, I'm surprised to see how refined the first version release is.
For my upcoming Bioinformatics conference assignment, I'm going to create a new iPhoto Library that I will use solely for that event. This will allow me to easily manage the hundreds of images that I'll be uploading to the Web, make prints, generate Web pages for archiving on CD, and who knows, maybe even create a picture book of the event.
There's a lot more to cover in this feature-rich application. If you'd like a follow-up article, make sure you post a TalkBack stating which features you're interested in learning more about.
Until then, go out there and shoot, shoot, shoot!
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a talkback.
Showing messages 1 through 51 of 51.
-
Exporting iPhoto folders to external hard drive
2007-06-06 18:10:54 SineadC [Reply | View]
I exported iPhoto folders to an external hard drive and when I open the folders on the drive I can see thumbnails of the landscape photos but the portrait photos just have a jpg icon. how do I get all photos displayed?
-
Exporting iPhoto folders to external hard drive
2007-06-06 18:10:16 SineadC [Reply | View]
I exported iPhoto folders to an external hard drive and when I open the folders on the drive I can see thumbnails of the landscape photos but the portrait photos just have a jpg icon. how do I get all photos displayed?
-
Canon QuickTime movies & iPhoto
2003-10-01 22:09:41 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I had the same problem you did.
I found the answer: use Apple Image Capture Application to download the quick movie clips off your camera.
-
iPhoto library too large
2003-06-25 12:43:47 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
This article was extremely informative regarding backing up my iPhoto library. Unfortunatly for me I found this article too late and my library foler is already too large to put on a CD. Short of purchasing a DVD burner is there a better way to "break up" the library and burn an archive?
-
Slideshow to CD?
2003-06-14 08:40:52 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
In iPhoto I created a slideshow with music and saved it in a quicktime movie format, but I cannot burn the file to a CD. Why not? What am I doing wrong?
-
Canon QuickTime movies & iPhoto
2003-04-14 14:48:04 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I have a Canon A70. I've set iPhoto as the default app for connecting to my camera, but iPhoto won't let me access the short movies from the camera.
I've tried launching Canon's ImageBrowser app, but iPhoto just takes over and there is no way to use the other app.
Is there a way to un-default the iPhoto, so I can use other apps? How?
Any suggestions for getting the QT movies out of the camera without un-defaulting iPhoto, also accepted.
Thx -
Canon QuickTime movies & iPhoto
2003-11-08 22:50:28 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Got a A80, running OS 10.2.8, iPhoto 2, Image capture 2.0.5. I have no problems browsing and importing photos or movies from the Camera using Image Capture- i.e. iPhoto will not start when I open the program or import.
/max
-
Canon QuickTime movies & iPhoto
2003-11-01 11:33:45 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Yes, unfortunately Apple has not given iPhoto the ability to see QT or AVI files. Maybe version 3?
You'll have to use Image Capture to get them off your camera.
Check out iVideo. It's just like iPhoto, but for all sorts of movie formats.
http://www.waterfallsw.com/products/ivideo/
-
Canon QuickTime movies & iPhoto
2003-07-09 01:33:50 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I have had exactly the same experience including not being able to use the stitich function because that can only operate through the canon image browser. I have not had much success finding answers.
Any ideas gratefully received. -
Canon QuickTime movies & iPhoto
2003-06-03 10:29:07 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I have the same camera. Rather than using any Canon software, I solved the problem by buying a Compact Flash card reader online for about $7.00. Now when I take the card out the camera and place it in the reader, iPhoto recognizes the card as "Mass Storage" and I can import the images as I did through the camera. (This also saves camera batteries.) But the really great thing is that the card shows up on the desktop as a generic hard drive and I can grab the movies right off card with the Finder. Quicktime plays the movies no problem. You can also then import the movies to iMovie and re-export them as Quicktime .MOV files which can be much smaller file size (for e-mailing) than the original .avi file, though it does loose some quality. -
Canon QuickTime movies & iPhoto
2003-04-14 23:08:12 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I figured this out! It's really easy to "un-default" iPhoto as the app to automatically use when plugging your camera into your Mac.
Run the Image Capture app (Applications > Image Capture) and then select "Image Capture > Preferences" from the menu. There you will be able to change what application is launched when plugging in your camera:
Camera Preferences
When a camera is connected, open: (iPhoto, Image Capture, No Application, or Other...)
Voila!
-
iPhoto
2002-03-23 23:50:06 jsanaker@mac.com [Reply | View]
Great article! I'm an experienced 35mm photographer who just began using a digital camera. And I loaded OS X on my Mac today just so I could have the use of iPhoto. I'm struggling with the new OS format, a printer that may be incompatible, and iPhoto, which is proving difficult to just simply open. Can anyone give me a little advice?
Joan Sanaker
-
running slideshow from CD - allignment problem
2002-02-25 05:31:33 bigtom [Reply | View]
Dear all,
I have burned my first complete iPhoto Library on CD and use iPhoto Librarian to load it. Unfortunately all pictures that I have rotated in this collection show up sideways when using the slideshow function. When I copy the iPhoto Library from the CD back to my hard disk, the pictures show up the right way.
Any ideas on that?
Thanks,
Thomas
-
iPhoto Scripts and Plug-ins
2002-02-05 20:36:06 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I just posted a new article titled iPhoto Scripts and Plug-ins that lists some really handy tools to expand iPhoto's functionality. They all work great, and best yet, they're free.
-
Image Editing in iPhoto?
2002-02-05 08:07:25 kingjerry [Reply | View]
A great article, Thanks
It seems to me that using any of the editing tools in iPhoto changes the stored image and the original is gone. Is it good practice to only use iPhoto for image storage and management and use other tools for image modification?
-
Image Editing in iPhoto? It's OK
2002-02-05 20:33:56 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Actually, iPhoto makes a copy of the original image and then applies your adjustments. You can always revert to the "master" by selecting FILE --> Revert to Original. So you only need to use third-party image editors for things that you can't do in iPhoto. -
Image Editing in iPhoto? It's OK
2002-02-06 17:30:46 ibobk [Reply | View]
Here is another alternative which will keep good control in the hand of the user, works even after you quit and relaunched iPhoto, uses an existing iPhoto command and, above all, is very simple. We checked it out with a Guru at one of the Apple shops. It works like this:
Use the 'Duplicate' command to create a duplicate image BEFORE going from 'Organize' to 'Edit'. The duplicate will be added next to the original image in the same roll, and with the same name + "copy". Now, if you edit the copy, the edited version will be saved by iPhoto within the same roll and you can also rename it as desired. To create another versions, go back any time later to 'Organize' and create another copy.
This, I believe will solve satisfactorily my earlier stated problem about the security of originals and the traceability of multiple versions from a single original. However, I will also create and keep a copy of my originals in a back-up folder outside of iPhoto.
Bob K -
Image Editing in iPhoto? It's OK
2002-02-09 15:15:34 Adam Engst |
[Reply | View]
It's a good idea to work on duplicates of particularly important photos since iPhoto doesn't always let you revert all the way back to the original with Revert to Original. I've seen situations with crashes and with editing in external applications where Revert to Original only takes you back to an intermediate version. Consider yourself warned.
cheers... -Adam
-
Responding to Archiving and Other Concerns
2002-02-01 23:13:08 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
First I'd like to say that this discussion has been very good, and I know from mail I've received, very helpful to many readers.
The archiving issue is a sticky one. I think Apple may have underestimated the sheer quantity of photos that many of us record on a regular basis. Afterall, that's the joy of digital photography, right?
But I still don't think this is a deal breaker. I've used iView too, and I think it's a good product. But I like iPhoto more because it's a better hub for sending photos to Kodak, to book printing, to web pages, to QuickTime, etc, etc.
I do have one nifty solution for those of you who would like to have iPhoto's Library reside on an external drive. It's a slick AppleScriptlet called iPhoto Librarian. Read the instructions, but basically it allows you to reset iPhoto's Library preferences to anywhere you want. So if you have a nice 40 GB external drive, you can dedicate it to your iPhoto Library. Kind of nice.
While using the application to manage my images for O'Reilly's Bioinformatics Conference, I had a chance to battle test it in combat conditions. It held up really well. My main disappointment was that I discovered that I couldn't search by "Title". I filled-in that field for every photo, which is useful for a variety of functions, but could not retrieve pictures by those titles. That definitely needs to be fixed for the next version.
As for some of the reported slideshow problems, I haven't been able to duplicate any of them on my Pismo or TiBook, so I hope other readers can help those folks out.
BTW: It looks like iPhoto is going to save me about 15 hours on this current conference job. Sweet!
-
Login as another user
2002-01-31 21:36:17 petercook [Reply | View]
Thanks very much for the great article. I think iPhoto is very close to being the killer app for OS X.
Of course another great thing about OS X is that it supports multiple users. Each user has her own Pictures directory. I don't know how practical this would be in practice but it occurs to me that this might be another solution to the issue of mutiple iPhoto Libraries.
You could set up a separate user for each major project. By logging in and out you would have a different library and a different set of key words.
-
printing images
2002-01-30 18:51:00 rspage [Reply | View]
I'm kind of new to the digital camera craze. I have an Olympus C3040 camera (3.34). I use iPhoto to store my photos. I use the SHQ or HQ settings (2048x1536). If I print one of the photos from iPhoto it comes out real nice. (I have a Stylus 860 printer...not so new 1440x720.) If I open the same photo in Photoshop and go to Image>Image Size, it says it is 72 dpi. I change the print size to 4x6, and print. The photo comes out not as good. I change the dpi to 300, print again and still not as good as iPhoto. Text is MUCH clearer and the color seems to be nicer in iPhoto. What would be the reasoning for this? And for a printer with my resolution what should I be setting my images to?
-
unfortunately unacceptable
2002-01-30 18:19:47 ibobk [Reply | View]
I share the concerns expressed by earlyjones, but hope to be able to stick it out with iPhoto until future versions will expand it's capabilities. Thanks for the excellent article, that helps with the workarounds tremendously, and I hope these comments will find their way to Apple's feedback channels. Reading your article my first thought was, how about using aliases, and I was glad to see some correspondence already on it. I will also try, and feed back to you.
-
Where is the Plug-in API
2002-01-30 17:52:31 ibobk [Reply | View]
I came across your accellent article through Apple's latest Mac OS X News. The same item that that referenced the article also said: "iPhoto bits were barely dry when the Omni Group’s Wil Shipley produced the first iPhoto plug-in." That might provide a contact for the desired API info.
-
Metadate & file structure
2002-01-30 11:54:39 wmjed [Reply | View]
What is a Metadata ?
And is there any technical info that actually describes the iPhoto file system structure?
Thanx
-
metadata is
2002-01-31 06:27:18 earlyjones [Reply | View]
metadata is "data about data". in the general context of image databases it usually refers to any textual data that describes the image file in any way. this can be broken down in to descriptive metadata, administrative metadata, and structural metadata. descriptive metadata describes what the content of the image is of and about. administrative might tell when the image file was created. structural metadata might describe the actual structure of the file format (a tiff file has a text header containing tags followed by binary image data, and so on). as you can imagine, there are many ways to go about this.
-
unfortunately unacceptable
2002-01-30 07:59:05 earlyjones [Reply | View]
Thank you for your in-depth article about iPhoto. I am a huge Macintosh fan, and a big fan of Apple's "i" software in general, so I was really excited when I heard of iPhoto. Unfortunately, I find the Library file storage model to be unacceptable. Your work-around (multiple Library files) is creative, but I feel Apple made a poor architectural decision. I believe it is critical for a program like iPhoto to be able to keep track of the archival version of the file, wherever it is kept (most likely on a CD). Perhaps it makes sense to cache copies of images in the Library for quick retrieval, but without the ability to easily archive, and track archived images, the program has a serious weakness. I also take issue with the fact that iPhoto renames all image files as it imports them. I already have thousands of digital images stored on CD, and the last thing I want is for them to be arbitrarily renamed. Finally, Apple needs to make it very easy to export metadata (iptc data, keywords, etc.) from iPhoto in a format that is commonly supported by spreadsheet and database applications. I would like to see Apple extend iPhoto to make easy the process of archiving digital photos. The people really need this more than they need the ability to make coffee-table books. Meanwhile, I'm sticking with iView MediaPro (www.iview-multimedia.com). It is easy to use, does the things I mention above, and is only $50. It doesn't directly link-up to a service like ofoto (though it facilitates preparation of images for sending to ofoto), or a the book-making service, but it does pretty much everything else and more. And I promise this is just my personal opinion and that I don't work for iView or anything like that. Thanks again for the good article and the forum for making these comments. -
unfortunately unacceptable
2003-08-03 21:12:39 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I agree. The entire concept of a database-type image organizer is flawed from the beginning, because it forces you to handle your images via a single application at all tiomes or else break the links to the data. This means you cannot move, delete, or rename files unless you do so in iPhoto.
What about a program like ACDSee?
-
iPhoto Bugs
2002-01-29 21:54:43 kapoors [Reply | View]
I do not know whether it is the limitation of my system (450Mhz G4) or a bug in the application. Even after installing and deinstalling the iPhoto three times my computer freezes as soon as I start a slide show in iphoto. Besides this, it is a great application. Hope Apple will do something soon to correct this bug. I wonder why no one has mentioned it so far.
-
How to have unique keywords for each "library"
2002-01-26 20:54:35 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
In the article I advocate that you choose your keywords carefully so they'll be useful over the long haul. But what if you want to have a unique set of keywords for each iPhoto library?
It's not really a problem. When you back up your iPhoto Library (in the Pictures folder), also grab the Preferences file and save it with the library. How do you do that?
First quit iPhoto.
Then find the file by following this path: "user" --> Library --> Preferences. In Preferences, look for the file, "com.apple.iPhoto.plist". Pull it out of Preferences and save it with the iPhoto Library.
The next time you launch iPhoto, it will create a new preferences file, which allows you to make new keywords to go with your new pictures.
But if you want to restore your old keywords with your previous iPhoto Library, then just swap the file back in the Preferences folder when you load the old iPhoto Library folder back into the Pictures directory.
-
Kodak Prints from iPhoto
2002-01-26 18:40:38 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Just received my 10 free Kodak prints from iPhoto, and as expected, they look sharp with good color. The glossy paper is a bit less dense than drugstore prints, but other than that, they appear to be a good value at 49 cents each, delivered to your (or grandma's) mailbox.
-
iPhoto and Netscape 4.0
2002-01-25 21:37:29 greggman [Reply | View]
I've been trying to find an example of a page of thumbnails, created by iPhoto, where there are around 125 images and each image has a border.
I think the most I've seen anyone post is like 15 thumbnails on one page.
The reason that I ask is I personal have a page like that from a different piece of software. It works fine under IE, NS6, Opera but it crashes Netscape 4.X. So, I'm wondering if Apple found a solution. If so, is it
*) You can't put that many images on a page using iPhoto. (Netscape 4.x does not crash there are only around 20 images.)
*) iPhoto does crash netscape 4.x and apple doesn't care because nobody is running netscape 4.x anymore
*) iPhoto uses slightly different HTML so that netscape 4.x does not crash.
Any chance somebody could try this for me? Take a 120 pictures, (or 20 duplicated 6 times etc..), make a page of thumbnails with iPhoto with all 120 thumbnails on the same webpage using a border around each thumbnail, post it somewhere so I can view it with netscape 4.x and see if it chokes or not
-
Sizing and compression
2002-01-23 14:56:41 bullyt [Reply | View]
Great mini-tutorial. Would you care to offer some guidelines for sizing and compression for uploading to Homepage or to my own ISP space? My most recent images (taken with my son's 2.1 megapixel Oly-my Oly 2100UZ is in the shop) are 1600x1200 and about 350k. Obviously these are too large for speedy web access, etc. I took a look at your sample website and not only did it load quickly the images were 12k. I do have GC.
TIA -
Sizing and compression -- a few tips
2002-01-23 23:10:54 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I'm a big fan of Graphic Converter. It's not the friendliest app in the world, but it sure does a good job of compressing Jpegs.
As you probably have figured out, I add a second step to iPhoto's slick web page generator. In addition to adding a little custom HTML at the top of the page so it isn't so danged dull looking, I use GC to further compress the pictures in the "Images" folder.
If you've used iPhoto's web generator, then you know that it creates 3 directories and an "index.html" file. You don't have to mess at all with the "Pages" directory. And happily, you don't have to play with the thumbs in the "Thumbnails" directory because iPhoto is good at compressing them. But I do recommend that you reduce the default setting for the thumbs from 240 pixels wide to a more reasonable 180 pixels wide.
But I think iPhoto is a little sloppy on compressing the pictures in the "Images" folder. I recommend that once your web directories are created, open those pictures in the "Images" folder with GC, save them between 70 and 80 "Quality," and make sure that the "save web ready" box is checked.
By doing this, you can reduce the file size of your 640 x 480 "enlarged" images by about 50 percent of what iPhoto initially creates.
My guess is that future versions of iPhoto will give us better compression control.
-
Critique of Picture Book
2002-01-23 07:27:12 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I created and placed an order for a linen-bound Picture Book via iPhoto on the evening of Sunday, Jan. 13. Apple sent me an e-mail that night confirming the order.
On Thursday, Jan 17, Apple notified me that the book had been shipped via USPS. And on Tuesday, Jan. 22 I received the order. I would have had it a day earlier, but we were all celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King Day! :-)
The packaging of the book was what I expected -- clean and efficient. A nice touch is the design of the clear plastic sleeve (that the book slides into) -- it's resealable. So you can carry the book around in the sleeve without worrying about getting the linen cover dirty.
The cover, binding, endpapers, and pictures themselves all looked great. Wonderful craftmanship on this product.
Apple gets a thumbs up on this one.
BTW: I also have 10 Kodak prints ordered that should be here soon. More to report.
-
Where is the plug-in API??
2002-01-22 14:17:40 megabight [Reply | View]
iPhoto is a cool app (although poorly documented), but it just SCREAMS for plug-in functionality extensions. I can think of tons of plug-ins I'd like to write for it - custom web-page generators, batch processing capabilities for renaming & archiving, etc. Does anybody know if there are some interfaces for this???
-
Where is the plug-in API??
2002-01-22 20:16:10 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Yes, that's a good question.
We know that iPhoto can be scripted with AppleScript because Apple has already provided four droplets:
http://www.apple.com/applescript/iphoto/
Has anyone tackled writing their own AppleScript for iPhoto yet? If so, I'd like to see the results. -
Where is the plug-in API??
2002-01-30 03:47:53 knowhow [Reply | View]
iPhoto is NOT scriptable! It does support being a source for Drag and Drop, which allows you to drag items to other applications and scripts, which is Apple's current workaround to add functionality through droplets. The iPhoto app itself has NO scripting support, either through its own dictionary or even the standard handful of required AppleEvents; i.e. you cannot even drag files onto the app's icon in the Finder to launch it with those files. It would be great to be able to script sequences of iPhoto operations, but in the 1.0 release it is just not possible.
-
Too limiting
2002-01-21 13:52:50 mmarcos [Reply | View]
Hi. Cool article. One thing I'm surprised at is that, as a photographer, you're not balking at the 1500-2000 image limit that Apple states in the iPhoto FAQ. I find that pretty limiting for my non-professional needs. I'm approaching these numbers just with pictures of my daughter. -
Too limiting, maybe not
2002-01-21 21:59:47 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Thanks for your comments. I bet your daughter is Dad's favorite model :)
Well, as I understand it, the picture limit isn't really a problem. Here's why ...
As I mentioned in the article, I close out iPhoto Libraries when they approach 700 MB. That way I can burn them on to CD with all the links in place.
I have 329 photos in my current photo library . I just checked the size of my "iPhoto Library" folder (in the Pictures directory), and it's already up to 521 MBs. That means in another 120 photos or so, I'm going to have to close that library and burn it on to CD.
Once I close the Library, I may choose to keep it on my hard drive because it's easier to activate that way rather than copying it back to my primary drive from auxiliary drive or from CD. Either way, I'm going to close it for back-up reasons.
I'm shooting 3.4 megapixel pictures, so even if you were shooting at half that resolution, I'd doubt that you'd still exceed 1,000 pictures before you reached the magic 700 MB library size that means it's time to close it out and burn a disc.
The exception to this limit is of course those lucky dogs who can burn DVDs. But as I said in the article, it's still a good idea to back up your pictures every Gig or so (if not more often!!!).
My guess is that as time goes by, we'll see some real improvements in iPhoto, including fewer restrictions for images per library. Remember, when iMovie first came out, you could only hold about a dozen clips on the shelf. Now that was a *serious* restriction!
-
Additional Tip and an Example
2002-01-20 13:01:08 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
As I was using iPhoto recently for an assignment, I remembered another tip I forgot to include in the article.
If you've shot a series of images that would make a good album, the easiest way to gather them is to click on "Last Import" to sort them out of the Photo Library. Then create a new Album, select all the photos displaying in "Last Import," and drag them into your new Album.
Here's an online example of a web page created with iPhoto. I shot the pictures of Olympic Torch bearer Rob Cotton in the morning, then used iPhoto to quickly sort, edit, and create the web page I posted hours later. iPhoto really simplified the process.
-
Make aliases?
2002-01-19 12:29:58 rspage [Reply | View]
Since I don't have a 40 or 60 gig HD, I suppose that after I burn an iPhoto Library onto a CD I could make an alias of it on my HD...then delete the original, and start all over again. This way when I click on the alias it will ask for the CD back. -
Make aliases?
2002-01-19 22:22:09 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
That does seem like it would work. Have you tried it? I'd be curious to hear how you felt about that system after playing with it for a while.
-
iPhoto slideshows
2002-01-18 11:52:22 bill67 [Reply | View]
Thanks for the helpful tips. Good article.
You said that you can see full screen slideshows on your TiBook. I find that if I export the slideshow using the Quicktime choice and using my 2.1 megapixel photos, the slideshow looks sharp in Quicktime.
However, if I use the built-in slideshow, clicking on the triangle in the main iPhoto window, the slideshow is somewhat blurred. The individual pictures are sharp viewed in their own windows, just blurred in the slideshow.
Has anyone else noticed this? Could I be doing something wrong? -
Opposite experience
2002-01-30 13:23:20 tgcox [Reply | View]
Frankly, I've been more impressed by the real-time slide show feature than the exportable/savable QuickTime slide show. Aside from the obvious differences—artistic crossfades and audio—the real-time slide show displays full screen images with less aliasing than the QuickTime alternative. If I export the same images as a QuickTime movie and review them at full screen with QuickTime Player Pro 5, they are noticebly grainy.
The images I used were only 640 x 480 jpegs. My Apple Studio Display's resolution is set at 1024 x 768.
I've asked this question at other forums but gotten no reply: How does iPhoto's real-time slide show enlarge the images without obvious aliasing? Does it convert the images to a format that OS X's Quartz engine favors (i.e. PDF)? -
iPhoto slideshows
2002-01-23 21:03:50 Michael Beam |
[Reply | View]
I think the answer to this is that the images are being displayed as OpenGL textures, which makes it possible to do the cool crossfade effects. I'm almost sure that this is the case with the Slideshow Screen Saver, which uses zooming and panning in addition to the crossfade. I'm not sure how the machinery of this all works, but i think i read somewhere that because the images are being displayed as OpenGL textures is the reason for the fuzziness. Anyone care to corroborate my story?
Mike -
iPhoto slideshows
2002-01-18 16:08:24 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I just tested iPhoto's slideshow on a TiBook, and the full screen images look the same there as in a standalone QuickTime movie.
My guess is that you're dealing with a resolution issue somehow. Are the photos you have in iPhoto the full 2.1 megapixels? If they are, they should look good at your TiBook's 1152 x 768 resolution.
Maybe the QuickTime version looks OK because you're not showing it at full screen.
Let me know if this helps at all.
-
iPhoto and OFOTO
2002-01-18 08:03:27 bradrice [Reply | View]
I like iPhoto, too. Good article. I like to share my images on OFOTO with family and friends. That way they can order prints if they like. I guess iPhoto actually uses OFOTO for print ordering. It would be nice if OFOTO or Apple builds a plug-in allowing the user to manage his or her online image account. OFOTO has its own software titled OFOTO Now, but the Mac version is only classic. I wrote to OFOTO asking them to tap into iPhoto, and that is when I learned they are the print service for iPhoto. I would like to be able to use it for more than just ordering prints through their service. -
iPhoto and OFOTO
2002-01-28 23:59:47 rgrow [Reply | View]
Apparently, Ofoto handles online pictures in a better way. I think it resizes them for easy downloading, while the pages exported from iTunes show the fulltime original picture. My mom complained that it took way longer to load the pictures I put up in my iTools acct. than it did from Ofoto. Plus, she likes being able to choose her favorites and order them.
-
Image Editor Thoughts
2002-01-17 22:12:08 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
One of my favorite moments during the Steve Jobs keynote address at Macworld was during the iPhoto demo. Steve was demonstrating the ability to set iPhoto's default image editor to a third party Mac OS X application such as Photoshop ... but wait ... there isn't a OS X version of Photoshop ... hmmm.
So what do you do since iPhoto has only cropping, rotating, B&W conversion, and red eye correction tools? Well you can link to the Classic version of Photoshop, but that can get frustrating.
Consider Graphic Converter, a $30 shareware program from Lemke Software, which is Mac OS X native. You can try it free for a while to see if you like it. There's some getting used to the different locations for the tools, but it's darn powerful.
I really like its Jpeg compression -- which creates much more compact files than other image editors. Also, it allows you to save "Web ready" (without resource). This is particularly nice when attaching Jpegs to e-mail for Windows PC users.





