The DigiCam Chronicles: Assignment Macworld
by Derrick Story coauthor of iPhoto: The Missing Manual, and author of the Digital Photography Pocket Guide01/14/2003
Author's note: This is the first in an ongoing series of photo essays demonstrating how to get the most out of your digital camera. Each installment of the DigiCam Chronicles will feature a new location or assignment. Today's subject is San Francisco focusing on images from the Macworld conference at Moscone Center, held the week of Jan. 6-10, 2003.
During my photo demos at Macworld, I usually mention that I'm a big fan of compact digital cameras. (Actually, I'm a fan of all digital cameras, but that's a different column.) Don't get me wrong, I'm crazy bout my Canon PowerShot G2, and I use it often for assignments that require big, 4 megapixel images. Certainly I'll be extolling its virtues in future DigiCam Chronicles.
But the G2 isn't what I consider a portable camera. So I also have a Canon Digital Elph, the PowerShot S200, which is compact enough to fit in my jeans pocket, yet offers enough photographic horsepower to capture satisfying images in a variety of settings. Its 2 megapixel CCD sensor is ample for QuickTime and Web work.
My standard quip for compact cameras usually starts with a question: "When do you encounter photo opportunities of a lifetime?" Answer: "When you don't have your camera with you." It doesn't do any good to have the best digicam in the world if it's sitting on your desk at home. On the other hand, compact cameras such as the Digital Elph S230, Nikon Coolpix 3500, and the Olympus C-50 Zoom make great travel companions, even if it's only for a trip to the grocery store.
|
Related Reading
Digital Photography Pocket Guide |
I kept my S200 with me every moment at Macworld, along with a Pedco UltraPod II that fits nicely in my back pocket. All the images in this first installment of the DigiCam Chronicles were captured with the Canon S200. As I'll do in future articles in this series, I'm providing camera data and explanation of shooting techniques to help you incorporate these types of pictures into your own photo essays.
Assignment: Macworld
Macworld provides both challenges and opportunities for digital photographers. Inside the conference you have to grapple with interior lighting and crowds of people. Outside you're presented with interesting architecture and people. The goal is to combine these elements into interesting essays.
Equipment for this assignment included:
- Canon S200 Digital Elph
- SanDisk 128MB memory card
- Spare Li-ion battery
- Pedco UltraPod II
- Apple PowerBook G4
- iPhoto 1.1.1 digital shoebox
- Photoshop 7 image editor
- QuickTime Pro 6.1
One of the visual themes I wanted to convey through these pictures was motion. Macworld is an exciting event that never sits still. To capture that feeling, I used a slow shutter speed and let people walk through the frame. This blurring effect in contrast to stationary items, such as the Macworld sign itself, expressed a feeling of activity. At least for me it did. How it works for you is purely a matter of judgment. I'll let you decide for yourself as you review these images.
The Photo Gallery
Moscone South at Twilight
|
|
This view of Moscone South is from the catwalk that connects the two convention halls. The South building is still considered the primary area, and it's where Apple sets up its camp.
The image was captured at 5:34 pm, a great time for "night shots" in the winter. You can add more color to your images if you shoot your night shots before the sky goes completely dark. The exposure was 1/2 second at f-2.8, set automatically by the camera in program mode. I used the UltraPod II on a ledge to steady the camera, and the self-timer set for a two-second delay to trip the shutter. The flash was turned off. ISO was set to 50.
Entering Macworld
|
|
This is the view I encountered as I descended down the escalator in Moscone North. I've taken this shot before, but the "frozen people" didn't express the energy I felt as I approached the Expo floor.
I decided to attach the camera to the handrail of the stairs and make a long exposure so the passersby would blur. The exposure was 1/2 second at f-3.5, set automatically by the camera in program mode. I used the UltraPod II to steady the camera and the self-timer set for a two-second delay to trip the shutter. The flash was turned off. ISO was set to 50. White balance was set to Auto.
Steve Shows Off New PowerBook
|
|
If you're not the official photographer and right up front, these keynote shots are tough. You have to deal with dim lighting, movement, and high contrast. Yet, these images are an important part of conference essays, so you have to buck up and do the best you can.
First thing, turn off the flash. It won't do you any good beyond 10 feet. Next bump up the ISO setting a couple notches. I don't like to use 400 unless I have to because it creates too much "noise." Here I used ISO 200 to give me a little more light sensitivity.
The shutter speed was 1/13 of a second. That's a bit long for a handheld shot with your arms extended over your head. So I used the "unsharp mask" filter in Photoshop to sharpen things up a bit.
I Want One
|
|
People went nuts over the new 12-inch PowerBook displayed in the Apple booth. This gentleman examined the new laptop from every angle, then "just became one with it."
The on-camera flash would have killed this shot, so I turned it off. Instead, I just let the glow from the display light the scene, allowing me to shoot at 1/125 of a second at f-3.5. The white balance was set to Auto, and the ISO was at 50.
You can't be shy with these shots. Get right in there, up close and personal, if you want to capture the mood.
Touch Me
|
|
Again, turn off that idiot flash if a better light source is available. I'd rather sacrifice a little motion blur to gain an expressive mood.
Because of the darker background, the shutter speed was a longish 1/20th of a second, at f-4. White balance was set to auto, and ISO at 50.
You have to hold the camera steady for these, but the result is usually worth the extra effort. Don't worry about lots of loss. One good picture will make you forget about ten bad ones in a hurry.
David Pogue in the O'Reilly Booth
|
|
Sometimes you just can't avoid using the flash. I tried everything in this darkish corner of the Expo Hall, and the images continued to look muddy and out of focus. I finally relented and turned on the flash.
But because of the wide area I was trying to illuminate, even the flash shots were underexposed. So I increased the ISO setting to 200 to extend my flash range, and finally got a shot worth keeping.
The exposure was 1/60th of a second at f-2.8, automatically set by the camera in programmed exposure mode. I changed the White Balance to "cloudy" to warm up the tones a bit. The camera was held up high over my head to provide the right perspective for this shot.
Playing with the Toys
|
|
Even though I like to shoot tight, sometimes it's good to step back and record the big picture. In this shot I let the signage determine the exposure so it would be readable, but wanted the booth visitors to be silhouetted. I like the effect.
The flash was off for this shot and programmed exposure was set to 1/25 of a second at f-2.8. White balance was Auto and ISO set to 50.
Looking Toward Third Street
|
|
This view of the Museum of Modern Art is from my hotel room on the 27th floor. Fortunately, the windows in the Marriott open just enough to perch my camera on the ledge to snap this picture.
I used the UltraPod II to steady the camera for the long exposure of 1 second at f-2.8. The self-timer allowed me to trip the shutter without jarring the camera. The white balance was set to "cloudy" to enhance the warm glow even more. ISO was 50.
Traffic Speeding By
|
|
By shooting this image at dusk (5:39 pm) instead of waiting until complete darkness, I was able to retain some nice color in the sky. The 1/2 second shutter speed created the light streaks of traffic speeding by, but because the camera was steadied on the UltraPod, the buildings are nice and sharp.
MOMA from Yerba Buena Gardens
|
|
I found a solid ledge to steady the camera as the lights came on and the sun began to set. I reviewed a number of images on the Canon's LCD viewfinder before I found a composition that I liked. This is a great advantage of digital cameras: to be able to fine tune shots right on location.
The long shutter speed of 1/2 second enabled me to record the richness created by the artificial lighting. I like the slight blurring of the two people walking, but some folks might not appreciate the effect.
QuickTime Movie
If you have some bandwidth, check out the QuickTime movie that features 22 images from this assignment and includes a nice soundtrack. This is one of my favorite ways to display still images, and having great tools like iPhoto and QuickTime Pro make these shows so easy to produce. The file size for this movie is 2 MBs, and you can save it to your hard drive once you've downloaded it.
I usually play bigger versions of these shows for people via my laptop (640 x 480 or 800 x 600), or I burn them on to CD or DVD and distribute them that way. That's a nice way to go because I don't have to deal with the limitations of bandwidth. But the Web version is pretty good too, and if you download it, I think you'll enjoy watching it.
Final Thoughts
That's it for the Macworld assignment. I hope you picked up a few tricks that you can incorporate into your shooting. My next report will probably be from Portland, OR. where I'll be teaching my next Mastering Digital Photography Workshop on March 3, 2003.
Until then, keep your batteries charged and your camera ready.
Derrick Story is the author of The Photoshop CS4 Companion for Photographers, The Digital Photography Companion, and Digital Photography Hacks, and coauthor of iPhoto: The Missing Manual, with David Pogue. You can follow him on Twitter or visit www.thedigitalstory.com.
Return to the Mac DevCenter.
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a talkback.
Showing messages 1 through 21 of 21.
-
Great photos, Derrick
2003-01-14 20:25:50 Corvus [Reply | View]
Did you do any post-production (e.g. Photoshop)? -
Great photos, Derrick
2003-01-14 22:06:27 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Glad you like em. If you're asking about "bumping up" the color saturation and stuff like that, the answer is no. For these shoots I used Photoshop to sample down because I think it resamples better than iPhoto, for some levels adjustments, and a dash of unsharp mask. That's it.
-
Shot from balcony
2003-01-14 20:44:06 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
The shot from your balcony of the MOMA at two different times is really cool in the video. The transition of lighting around it is really neat. -
Shot from balcony
2003-01-14 22:03:04 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Thanks. That's a fun trick. The first shot is the same one that's on the Web page titled "Looking Toward 3rd Street." I used the "cloudy" white balance setting to add additional warmth to the image. The second shot, shown only in the QuickTime movie, is the same composition, but I changed the white balance setting to "tungsten" (indicated by the light bulb icon) to cool off the tones. The final effect was achieved by using a crossfade transition to move from the warm shot to the cool one. iPhoto handled the transition mechanics for me when it generated the QuickTime slideshow.
-
Nicely detailed
2003-01-15 03:58:21 russh [Reply | View]
The details in the article are extremely helpful for a novice like me who wants to learn to think like a photographer.
Sounds (and looks) like you had a great Macworld.
Thanks Derrick! :)
-
Assignment MacWorld
2003-01-15 14:24:57 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Nice to see such great work without a billion dollars worth of equipment! Makes me want to a small digital to my working collection. -
Assignment MacWorld -- Yeah!
2003-01-15 23:22:36 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
You know, that's the whole point of this particular assignment. You can use regular consumer digicams and get terrific results. The hi-end cameras are wonderful, and for some tasks necessary, but you can make a lot of good images with the little guys too.
-
Excellent article!
2003-01-16 05:22:43 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I'm sure many people will enjoy this and so far everyone that I've recommended it to have!
Looking forward to seeing the next assignment!
All the best,
// Mads - http://www.madspedersen.com
-
The DigiCam Chronicles: Assignment Macworld -
2003-01-17 09:25:56 napanerd [Reply | View]
Derrick,
This was absolutely stunning. I am going today to get the Ultrapod II and (if I can steal the money from my wife) I've got to upgrade to a Canon camera.
Thanks,
Jim Gillespie -
The DigiCam Chronicles: Assignment Macworld -
2003-01-20 07:54:48 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Thanks.
Getting the $$$ for the UltraPod II will be a lot easier than for the Canon digicam. But the $20 you spend on the UltraPod will improve your pictures regardless of what camera you're using.
Tell your wife that you'll use the tripod (and the self timer) to take a "couples portrait" of the two of you. It's a fun assignment, and worth the price of the 'Pod alone.
-
Camera suitable for closeups?
2003-01-18 10:35:14 dicklacara [Reply | View]
Excellent Article.
It caught my eye because I am looking to purchase my first digicam for a one-time specialized need. But, I also
want it for future general pictures of the grandkids, etc.
My immediate need is to take close-up pictures of Jewelry and House-Hold items for a Home Inventory database.
I haved jerry-rigged a scanner to get images of the jewelry, but the results are unsatisfactory, even after a lot of fiddling around.
Can the S200 be used for the closeups as well as more general-purpose use?
Do I need an external flash?
If not the S200, what do you recommend?
Dick -
Camera suitable for closeups?
2003-01-20 07:50:09 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
If one of your primary goals is to shoot close up shots, you have to look at Nikon's digicams -- they excell at macro photography. You can get by nicely with the CoolPix 3500 if you're on a budget, but you have to use "hot lights" since it doesn't have a hot shoe for external flash. If you have a few more $$$ look at the other Nikon offerings -- they're terrific for this type of work.
Another favorite camera of mine right now in the mid price range is the Olympus C-5050. It accommodates 3 different types of media, has a hot shoe, tilt LCD monitor, 5 megapixels, and accepts auxiliary lenses -- all in a tiny package for about $700. Very nice.
-
Quicktime Video
2003-01-19 09:33:48 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Is the video a product of iPhoto 'Share' (or if you used Quicktime Pro, could something similar (quality, size) be made using iPhoto )?
M. S. -
Quicktime Video
2003-01-20 07:44:15 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
There are a number of different ways to produce QuickTime slideshows with Apple tools. For this video I used the "Export" command directly out of iPhoto. I created the front and end titles in Photoshop, then added them them to my iPhoto album so they would be included in the QT export.
I needed QuickTime Pro to edit the music. Just opened my mp3 file in QT, sliced and diced, then added it to my slideshow using the "Add" command in QT Pro.
I could have done all of this other ways, but for this project I wanted to stick to iPhoto and QuickTime as much as possible.
-
battery life
2003-02-11 12:12:43 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I was wondering how you found the battery life of the s200 as I have read on the web that it isn't so great.
Thanks.
Ali -
battery life
2003-02-11 16:18:55 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I haven't had a problem with battery life with the S200. In other words, the battery hasn't failed during a normal day's shooting. Then I recharge it at night. I always, always carry a spare battery though. Regardless of which camera you choose, I'd recommend the same.
-
A side subject on your article...
2003-02-18 00:52:49 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
You have mentioned that you used the Ultrapod II quite a bit during your shooting. Is it important, in your experience, to have a big enough tripod for your s200, or Ultrapod I will practically do the job?
Sy -
A side subject on your article...
2003-02-20 08:11:44 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
The larger of the two tripods, the Ultrapod II is far and away my favorite. To me it feels much steadier and will attach to larger diameter poles and tree limbs. The smaller Ultrapod I is more portable, but just isn't macho enough for me.
-
perplexed
2003-02-19 14:05:13 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I am a novice photographer, and based on your excellant article I purchased a Canon S200. I'm trying to duplicate the shooting parameters that you quoted in the article but have difficulty relating the automaticsetting with the specific f-#s and shutter speeds. For example, when you state that: "The exposure was 1/2 second at f-2.8, set automatically by the camera in program mode" was this information provided by the S200 or the a header in the jpg graphics file -
perplexed
2003-02-20 08:16:42 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
As you probably know from my other writings, I use iPhoto to manage my images. When I'm in that application, I can click on any photo, hit CMD-I, and get that image's metadata, including the exposure information. You can also retrieve the metadata in Photoshop, or even standalone metadata apps.
Even when I'm using a more simple camera, such as the Canon S-200, I like to know what exposure combinations produce my favorite pictures. This is helpful when I want to repeat the effect with another camera.
Hope this helps ...
-
Good article...but, I am confused..
2003-02-20 22:44:44 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
on the detail that you have disclosed. I recently bought a S200, so I started reading article online. I am just a beginner, so maybe that's why I am confused on all the terms that were being used in your article. For example, when you say "automatically programmed by the camera", do you mean that you just point and shoot and let the camera take over?
From my camera, I can only find exposure control in manual mode from -2 to +2, long shutter control from 1 sec to 15 sec. So, I am confused when you said the camera set the exposure to 1/20th sec, how does the camera set that? Does exposure equal to shutter speed, if yes, how did you get less than 1 sec from S200? Also, what are the f-2.8, f-3.5 and so mean? How do I set those?
Your article and the photos are very impressive, and they made me wanting to learn how to take digital photos other than let the camera do the whole thing. However, it would be nice if I could get some explanations from you on those terms and usages. I am already buying one of the book...just can't wait to ask the questions first. :)
Sy















