A Photographer's Review of the Canon EOS 10D Digital SLR
Pages: 1, 2
Shooting with the EOS 10D
One of the first things you'll notice, especially if you've been shooting with digital rangefinders lately, is that the Canon's LCD monitor is for reviewing pictures, not for taking them. It does have an excellent "Info" display that shows you the primary settings you've selected. But even that goes off once you touch the shutter release. This camera is designed for framing with the optical viewfinder.
You can set the LCD monitor, however, to display the picture right after you've recorded it. Even though I've used that function on other cameras, I've turned it off on the 10D. In all honesty, the 10D captures such good shots that I don't have to nervously review each one to feel confident during the shoot. If I do want to see the last frame, I simply press the review button and it appears right away.
Normally I have to wear my reading glasses when I shoot with digital cameras. They're needed mainly because I'm so dependent on the LCD monitor to frame the image, and all of those small-font settings (controlled by tiny buttons with even smaller labels) to program the camera. When I'm shooting with the 10D, the reading glasses stay in my pocket, except for when I want to examine pictures on the LCD. Otherwise, the diopter adjustment in the viewfinder enables me to easily read f-stop, shutter speed, exposure compensation, and flash status while I'm composing the picture. If you've shot with Canon before, and are used to working the thumbdial and exposure lock button, you'll feel right at home with the 10D.
|
|
Focusing with this camera is pure joy. Mount one of Canon's Ultrasonic lenses, and marvel at how this camera quickly locks on to a subject. It doesn't have eye control focusing as with the Elan and the high end film cameras, but the 10D's 7-point focusing is very intelligent, and you can easily override it and set any single focusing point on the fly.
The 10D can focus in light as low as .5 EV without focus assist. If you want focus assist, then you pop open the built-in flash and it will emit enough light for the camera to lock on to the subject. Depending on how you have Custom Function #5 set, the flash with either go off when you make the exposure, or not fire at all. You make the call.
Surprising Features That Made Me Smile
Since you're not shelling out the really big bucks for the top of the line model, there are a few luxuries you'll have to live without. But not many. The EOS 10D costs about $6,500 less than Canon's flagship digi, the EOS 1Ds. Yet the 10D has lots of pro features that were a pleasant surprise for a camera in this price range. Here are my favorites:
Electronic depth of field button--Visually checking depth of field on a precision laser-matte screen is a joy of SLR photography. The 10D allows you to do so in style.

The EOS 10D provides a terrific depth of field preview so I can compose the shot exactly as I want.Mirror lockup--Custom function 12 allows you to lockup the mirror prior to long exposures for maximum sharpness. Press the shutter once and the mirror raises. Press it again (preferable with a remote release) to begin the exposure. Press it one last time to end the exposure and drop down the mirror.
Backlit top LCD--When working in low light, all you have to do is press the "light bulb" button and the top LCD glows an amber orange color. All of your settings can be easily read in the worst of lighting conditions, and usually without glasses.
Traditional PC flash terminal--Yes, you can use the EOS 10D in the studio with your manual strobe lighting.
Second curtain flash sync--This feature is an absolute must for motion flash photography because it allows the flash to go off at the end of the exposure instead of at the beginning.
Mac OS X Compatibility and Uploading to iPhoto
The EOS 10D delivers both good and bad news for Mac OS X users. The good news first--the EOS Solution CD, v5, includes OS X versions of the latest Canon applications: ImageBrowser 3.0, PhotoStitch 3.1, RemoteCapture 2.7, and File Viewer Utility 1.2. These apps run well and are still the best way to tap the immense amount of metadata recorded by the 10D. (Windows users have these apps plus a few additional goodies.)
Canon also includes Photoshop Elements 2.0 for Mac OS X (and Windows), a terrific image editor second only to Photoshop 7.0 (which costs bundles of money and isn't necessary for most shooters).
I was surprised however, that the 10D couldn't communicate with iPhoto 2.0 via the USB cable. The previous model, EOS D60, is on Apple's approved camera list. I figured that the 10D would automatically connect, but iPhoto couldn't see it.
I took the CompactFlash card out of the camera and used my PC Card adapter on the PowerBook. There was an odd delay, about 30 seconds, where the Mac was trying to figure out the information on the card. I couldn't do anything else during this time; all computer operations were halted. Then, as if the spell had been magically lifted, iPhoto launched, the PC Card appeared on my Desktop, and the media card was recognized by name, ready for uploading.
|
|
I imported a batch of pictures and used the "Show Photo Info" command in iPhoto. The image metadata was there, including camera settings and ISO.
So for the moment, it seems that you'll need a media card reader to use the EOS 10D with iPhoto 2.0. Once the card and application recognize each other, things proceed normally. One feature that I was hoping Canon would include on this camera, USB storage device connectivity, still isn't there, despite the fact that Nikon and Olympus have been offering it for some time. If Canon were to go down that road, then drivers would become a non-issue. You plug in the camera, and it appears as a hard drive on your Desktop. It's that simple. I hope that Canon adds USB storage device capability to their cameras soon.
But other than the mysterious delay I experienced when I first inserted the PC card adapter into my TiBook, I haven't had any bumps in the road while moving images from the EOS 10D to the Mac. If I want to use FileViewer utility, I can. But for the most part, I just jam the CompactFlash card into the computer and let iPhoto take it from there.
|
|
Is This the Camera for You?
That's the $1,500 question, isn't it? For many advanced amateurs and pros who already own Canon lenses, I think this might be the camera that firmly establishes them in digital photography. The EOS 10D combines true performance with excellent image resolution and the features that photographers want.
If you're a "wide-angle" shooter, however, you may want to wait just a bit longer before investing in a digital SLR, unless you have gobs of money for the EOS 1Ds, or if you already have a 16mm Canon wide angle in your camera bag. Even so, mount that 16mm on the 10D, and it's instantly narrowed to a 25.6mm lens. Decent, yes, but you probably didn't pay those premium dollars just to have a 25mm lens that you could otherwise purchase for a fourth the price. At this point in time, it's much more cost effective to put a wide angle converter on a high-end rangefinder digicam.
On the other hand, if you're a tele shooter, you'll think you've died and reached the afterlife. Your inexpensive 100 - 300mm tele is now a whopping 160 - 480mm monster lens, without any compromise in light transmission or performance. Nature and sports photographers take notice!
For long time photographers who've been ready to try digital, but didn't want to give up the exquisite SLR experience, the Canon EOS 10D is probably the camera they've been waiting for. It's a photographic tool that distinguishes itself regardless of the media it uses. And the fact that it's digital makes it all the better. I believe this is the start of a new era in photography.
Derrick Story is the author of The Photoshop CS4 Companion for Photographers, The Digital Photography Companion, and Digital Photography Hacks, and coauthor of iPhoto: The Missing Manual, with David Pogue. You can follow him on Twitter or visit www.thedigitalstory.com.
Return to Mac DevCenter.
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a talkback.
Showing messages 1 through 55 of 55.
-
Purchasing in US market from Spain
2004-01-02 20:11:09 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Congratulations on your article! After having gone through different internet stores both in the US and Europe, the devaluation of the US dolar vs the Euro could save me some money if buying at a US store "from my PC" back in Europe. Any experiences in this matter? Will all the equipment, pieces, guarantee work out OK in Europe. I'm afraid that saving some money could cost me, on the other hand, lots of problems.
-
Telephoto Joy
2003-10-16 17:21:25 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
LOVE this camera!!! The 100-300 Sigma F4.0 EX was made for this camera. SUPER FAST and smooth auto focus. Another thing most folks don't realize is the 1.6 crop on the lens sees only the sweet spot in a lens. Right through the center when a full frame sees all the corners. You don't have to spend 3 grand anymore on telephoto zooms!
-
amateaur hobbyist
2003-09-16 13:40:40 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I recently purchased the 10D. I am not a professional photographer, I just love photography. I purchased a macro lens (mp-e 65mm), with the ring light and the remote switch and a 28-300 mm. What do you think about these two lens? Another question is I want to make a panoramic picture of a landscape. What exposure do you recomend? I can use a tripod so I can have a long exposure and a small aperture which will give me good depth of field? Is this what I need to do? Or do I just put the landscape setting?I want to get the most possible sharpness throughout the picture. Yesterday I discovered the camera came with a software that included photostitch so I do not have to get it.
Your article was very good, thanks a lot. I would also appreciate it a lot if you comment on my questions. -
mp-e 65mm
2003-11-05 07:52:04 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Have a look on this site to see how what the mp-e 65mm is able to produce, (With the dedicated flash MT-24EX Macro TwinLite), and how to use properly this beatifull lense with a numeric camera.
http://www.frankphillips.com/macro/
http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/mp-e-65.shtml
http://www.vividlight.com/articles/2914.htm
Bye, Olivier from FRANCE.
-
Action
2003-09-10 20:05:56 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
How does this dlsr do in action photo duty? (How quick is the af, etc?)
-
focusing with 28-135mm
2003-09-05 13:32:32 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Has anyone been having problems with auto/manual focusing? I'm seeing a lot of pictures from different photography majors, including grad students, all using the 28-135mm and/or a 16mm wide-angle lens and the photos tend to be to be slightly out of focus. -
focusing with 28-135mm
2003-10-16 17:39:20 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Really wide zooming lens will always have drawbacks. A "standard" zoom of 28-75 will make one much happier. Tamrons SP AF XR Di with a constant 2.8 is just over $300. It was designed with digital in mind and the tests I've seen put it on equal ground with Canon's $1000 plus standard zoom. I have the lens and it sharp as a tack!
-
B&W Capability?
2003-07-20 20:46:00 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Does the 10D have the ability to shoot in B&W? Or do you have to take the images into photoshop and remove the color there?
-
B&W Capability?
2003-07-21 08:12:57 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I just took a quick breeze through the menus, and I don't see a BW control for the 10d. Maybe it's hidden, or just not there.
The thing that I do is use the "Batch" command in Photoshop 7 to convert to BW. That way I have the master "negs" in color, but can automate their conversion to BW.
-
memory card
2003-07-05 11:36:46 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Terrific article, I am seriously tempted to pick up one of these cameras.
Your comment on the flash card seemed like a nit. But if someone is disappointed it doesn't come with a flash card, think how ticked they will be when they find out it doesn't come with a lens!
Seriously, I would think that someone considering this class of camera would toss any memory card packaged with this camera, opting to pick up the largest, fastest card available. Maybe it won't help that much but it only feels right in a camera like this. -
RE: memory card
2003-07-06 09:06:42 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
What! There's no lens! ;)
Seriously, I agree that people who buy this camera aren't going to find much use for a 16MB "starter" card. And I understand the economics of price competition. But, heck, I think a 128MB card in the box would get folks off to a nice start the moment they receive the camera. A small point, but one that I would appreciate. -
RE: memory card
2003-07-10 14:59:08 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Considering these cameras are in such high demand and short supply, if you order your card at the same time it'll probably show up before the camera. That's what happened to me at least. I ended up staring at my 1GB CF card for a week before I got my 10D. =) -
RE: memory card
2003-10-07 12:42:39 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
When I ordered my camera, I ordered for the 1Gb high speed memory card at the same time. If you haggle like crazy, alot of the required bits that are generally not included, you will be able to get for a excellent deal. I was able to get the card for 1/2 price.
-
EOS 10D Takes the Wedding Challenge
2003-04-15 10:51:56 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
As promised earlier, I've posted a catalog of images from a recent wedding I shot. Even though this event was a "film" assignment, I brought the EOD 10D along too.
I put the camera on a flash bracket with a Canon 422EX connected via a dedicated synch cord. As you'll see from the shots, I used direct flash, bounce flash, and existing light (no flash was allowed during the ceremony).
I really enjoyed working with the 10D for this assignment. Sure wish I could have shot the whole event with this camera...
-
OS X 10.2.5 Adds iPhoto Compatibility for the 10D
2003-04-15 07:25:04 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I finally had a chance to download the 10.2.5 update and test iPhoto with the EOS 10D. Everything is rosy now. When connected via the USB cable, iPhoto recognizes the camera by name, and uploads the images without a hitch.
The thing I did notice is that this process seems slower than when I used the PC Card adapter and inserted the media directly into my TiBook. So it's nice to have the USB connection working, but for now I think using the media card adapter is faster.
-
In stock
2003-04-10 13:04:40 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I must be VERY lucky because on Tuesday afternoon I placed on online order for the 10D with B&H. Thursday afternoon at 2pm I was taking my first photos with this beauty. Of course, I must have been very lucky with the timing of my order.
so far so good... Moe, Illinois
-
Has anyone tried 10.2.5?
2003-04-10 12:42:12 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
The update documentation for 10.2.5 states that the EOS 10D is supported. Has anyone actually tried it yet?
-
Has anyone tried 10.2.5? -- Great News? Other Update too.
2003-04-11 08:13:56 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I haven't downloaded the update yet because I'm on the road (in New Jersey) and only have dialup at the moment. But I did read the docs and saw the same thing. I think this is really good news. If anyone's tested it, please post.
BTW: I'm in NJ to shoot a wedding and am going to use the 10D as one of the cameras. I'll post an update that includes both wedding and sports photography tryouts.
Just as a preview though, I took the camera out to a track practice and shot a friend who runs hurdles. I nailed just about every frame with the 10D. It responded even better than my Elan II. More to report soon.
-
Included memory Cards
2003-04-03 20:27:17 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Canon has released the EOS10D Pro Pack which comes with the EOS 10D Standard Kit, Sandisk ULTRA 256MB Compact Flash Card, and additional BG-ED3 Battery Grip, BP-511 Li-Ion Battery Pack. -
Included memory Cards -- More Info?
2003-04-03 21:39:05 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I nosed around on the Web and didn't stumble across the EOS 10D Pro Pack. Could you provide a few more details such as pricing and URL? It might be of interest to readers of this review. Thanks!
-
Review article of Canon 10D
2003-04-03 12:59:35 allanb [Reply | View]
Good review article...I just received mine two days ago and think I have died and gone to heaven...this model is it !!!! Also, am on a waiting list for the new 17-40 lens as I am somewhat disappointed about my 28-80 not being wide angle capable anymore...for us landscape shooters, I used my 28-80 on my Elan without a problem...now I have to purchase a new lens to get close to 28mm....good way for Canon to sell more lenses...otherwise, wonderful piece of epuipment.... -
Review article of Canon 10D -- the 17-40mm Zoom
2003-04-03 14:31:50 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
When you get that 17-40mm zoom lens, please let us know what you think via a TalkBack here. I think many 10D owners will be eyeing that lens and wondering if it's worth the extra $$$.
Much thanks...
-
D100 not there?
2003-04-02 18:19:49 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Derrick-
What about the D100 is not there? -
D100 not there? -- close, but not quite
2003-04-03 00:28:05 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
The D100 is an excellent camera. No doubt about it.
When it first came out it was $2,000 US as was Canon's D60 (which also was "still not there yet"). Now the D60 is out of production, and the D100 is available at B&H for $1,700 US.
The reason why I did not buy the D100 or the D60 was because I felt the price still was too high for the features they delivered. The Nikon is a good picture-taker, but you have to use RAW mode to get the resolution I wanted. Even the finest Jpeg setting is still a little soft.
On the other hand, the fine Jpeg mode on the 10D is almost indistinguishable to RAW in terms of resolution. RAW is fine for certain types of shoots, but Jpeg is much more convenient. I don't want to have to use RAW all the time to get a sharp picture.
The D100 and D60 also have a plastic bodies compared to the more robust magnesium chasis of the 10D. Again, nothing wrong with a modern plastic body, just not in a $1,700 camera.
There are a host of other little things that I'm sure Nikon will improve on their next release in this category, such as slow storing in compressed RAW mode, and the lack of a PC flash socket. None of this means that the D100 is anything less than an excellent camera. But for me, a photographer who needs every drop of performance for as low a price as possible, the 10D was the first digital SLR that hit the magic combination of performance and tolerable price.
I'm sure Nikon is working on their response to the 10D. And I'd bet it's going to be impressive. -
D100 not there? -- close, but not quite
2003-04-03 12:35:32 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I can certainly see what you're saying. For me dealing with RAW is more of an inconvenience than anything else.
When I bought my f100 I spent a great deal of time weighing whether or not to go completely digital. The D100 was still at 2k and it just didn't have the same hand feel of the f100 (coming off an F3HP). Now I'm just waiting (like so many other f mount users) for new nikon. -
D100 not there? -- the Next Nikon
2003-04-03 14:25:48 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Yes, for those of you who are Nikon shooters, I'm confident that their answer to Canon's 10D will be a superb one. Given that the D100 is such a good camera already, and that the horse race going on between Canon, Nikon, and Fuji is so competitive, I think things are looking good for digital photographers in 2003.
-
i have a qestion
2003-04-02 14:43:49 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
i don't know a thing about photography but am thinking about buy my first digital camera. i have one question
Why do the photos of the flows you took look SOOOOO good?
Could anyone explain why they look so much sharper and vivid?
I guess it has to do with the shutter staying open longer??
Is "control" one of things you are buying when you spend 700$ + on a camera?
thanks
signed a complete neophyte.
-
i have a qestion
2003-06-18 13:41:49 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
The reason the flowers look soooo good is a result of the 6 megapixel CMOS chip used in the 10D but also more subtley because in the past pictures on the Web were either taken with chaeper lower resolution digicams or scanned from prints taken with high-end SLR's. The 10D makes it convenient to get the quality of a high-end film-based SLR with the beauty of NOT going from refractive to reflective to refractive in taking a picture (refractive) scanning it (reflective) and displaying it on the Web (refractive). It's similar to the result you get by scanning in slides instead of prints. -
i have a qestion
2003-04-03 19:44:17 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
thank you!
hmm.. have to try out a few cameras before i find the right one?
maybe i should look into some local photo clubs... -
I have a question -- the long answer
2003-04-02 15:07:01 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Glad you like the photos. And it's a good question. Now for my long answer...
We talk a lot about "convergence" these days. Digital photography, for example, is the convergence of computers and cameras. But nearly every type of photography is the result of convergence -- typically man and machine working together to produce compelling pictures.
A great camera will not make you a great photographer. But a lousy camera will frustrate a good photographer -- and I believe will have a negative impact on the pictures he or she takes.
So what's important, IMHO, is that you find the right camera for you -- one that you can bond with, becomes an extension of your vision, and is a complement to your talent. Sometimes this takes a while, and you have to go through a few cameras to get there. (At least that's what I tell friends when I show up with a new one in hand!)
One of the reasons why I wrote this review of the EOS 10D is because I believe that SLRs are easier cameras to bond with than most of the digicams available today. But digital SLRs have been too expensive. The 10D is expensive too, $1,500 US. But for photographers who miss having that SLR "soul mate" they left behind in the analog world, the 10D may prove to be the "other half" that many shooters have been waiting for, including myself. Nothing against the rangefinders I have. There are a couple models I've really bonded with. But instead of being my only digicams, I can now use them in situations best suited for their design, such as travel and wide angle photography.
A photographer who likes his or her equipment tends to take better pictures, regardless of camera brand or price.
I like the EOS 10D and enjoy shooting with it. I look at my pictures closely on the computer and adjust them if I have to. It's the convergence of many factors that make a good photograph. Which camera you choose is part of that equation, but it's not the only factor. -
I have a question -- the long answer
2003-04-12 23:37:05 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Derrick - first let me say what a very nice review you provided.
I totally agree with about the 'bond' between shooter and camera. I refer to this as the photographers extension because I believe the camera is an extension of both the photographers eye and hand as he/she tries to 'reach' for what it is that they are seeing at the moment.
Bond story - when my girlfriend asked for a compact digital camera for xmas she was confused when I said ok but only if she promised to go and handle each and every model that we could get our hands on - twice ! She did so, the first time with me explaining what all the options meant and the second time on her own (well I was really looking on from afar). She admitted that it helped and she was much happier in the end.
As for myself - I have been shooting with a Sigma outfit for years and am just now thinking about moving over to the digital realm. I was just waiting for a decently priced digital with a SLR feel and I think this may be it.....
I wonder if you know if the Sigma lens with fit this model ? I tried to find out at the Canon website but those silly flash pages made me mad and I gave up. -
I have a question -- consider the Sigma body
2003-04-13 08:05:38 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Hi, thanks for your comments. About those Sigma lenes you have...
You might want to take a look at the Sigma SD9 with the new Foveon sensor. It's a pretty good looking camera body that accepts all the Sigma lenses. The SD9 sells for the same price as the Canon 10D.
I haven't tested the body, but the Foveon technology is pretty interesting, and if you like it, you can preserve your lens and flash investment.
-
Focal Length
2003-04-02 12:06:48 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
When talking about the 1.6x multiplier on the focal length. Isn't it a little mis-leading to say that, "Your inexpensive 100 - 300mm tele is now a whopping 160 - 480mm monster lens..." It is my understanding that the field of view is cropped so your lens still has the same magnification and depth of field of the lens you are using. So a 300mm lens still has the magnification of a 300mm lens not a 480mm lens, the image is just cropped like you were using a 480mm lens. You are not actually bringing the object closer. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
Matt -
Focal Length -- Well...
2003-04-02 13:20:19 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
If you take your 300mm lens and put it on a 35mm body and look through it, then you take the same lens and put it on the EOS 10D, objects "appear" closer, by 1.6X in fact.
Maybe a optics expert will jump in here and comment, but in the field, that's what happens. -
Focal Length -- Well...
2003-04-02 17:47:34 mattparker [Reply | View]
I still don't fully understand it. Here is a site that helps to explain the multiplication factor: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/dslr-mag.shtml
What is confusing from this article is,
"Crop is a fairly good term the imaging area is physically smaller. Less of the image circle projected by the lens is used, therefore it is a crop. The image remains the same size at the film plane for a given lens and subject distance it is in no way magnified. It does, however, take up a larger proportion of the (smaller) frame and so it is easy to see why some people call it a magnifying effect. This is also why a tele lens appears so much more powerful the field or angle of view has been reduced. This is great for nature and sports photographers as the net result is more real pull than before with no trade off of maximum F Stop loss."
So is the image bigger because we are enlarging the smaller "film size" more? If I use a 300mm on a 35mm camera and then on a DSLR am I actually bringing the subject "closer"? If I am not actually bringing it "closer" does the enlargement end up having the same result of a longer lens? Sorry just thinking out loud.
It is all very confusing. -
Focal Length -- Well...Yes and No
2003-07-06 17:56:00 dafuller [Reply | View]
Yes, the image is larger because you are enlarging a smaller film size more. If you put the same 300mm lens on a DSLR with a 1.6 factor and a 35mm camera, the DSLR will produce the same angle of view as a 480mm lens on the 35mm camera. And it will do it by cropping the image.
Does the enlargement end up having the same result as a longer lens? No, it does not. There is one important difference: At the same angle of view and f-stop, the DSLR will have greater depth of field.
This is hard to understand if you have always used only one film format (35mm for example), because within one frame size, depth of field seems to be related only to the f-stop and focal langth of the lens. But there are really three factors at work:
1. Depth of field increases as the lens is stopped down (the f-number increases).
2. Depth of field increases as focal length decreases (wider lenses appear to have more depth of field than longer ones telephotos).
3. Depth of field increases with the subject distance.
So... If I put the same lens (300mm) on my DSLR, I have to stand farther away from the subject to achieve the same framing, and the depth of field is greater. OR... if I insist on standing in the same place, I have to use a shorter sens on my DSLR. Again, depth of field is greater.
How important is this? it depends on the kinds of portraits you take. It's one of the reasons large-format film cameras are still preferred by many for portraits: less depth of field. (See, it works in the opposite direction, too.)
Hope this helps,
David -
Focal Length -- Well...
2003-05-06 07:40:19 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
hi Matt,
I am no optics expert but I think i can explain the scenarios you are confused about.
Essentially canon have crammed their CMOS censors into a smaller area than the 35mm back of a standard SLR (1.6 x smaller?). So, only the light rays travelling very close to parallel with each other, directly into the camera, will be represented on the final image.
A zoom lense does exactly the same thing, except it uses a lense to take a small area of light and expand it onto a 35mm back. This is why they need more light (bigger f-stop) to be used at the same shutter speed. If you pretended that the 35mm back was 70mm and the magnification was 2x then you would have the same pictures....
You are never bringing a subject closer, only by optics selecting which light rays you want to see. The rest are either out of focus or off the frame...
Does that make sense?
cheers
kris
-
Focal Length -- it's like higher resolution
2003-10-30 20:43:16 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
if you crop an image, you rae losing image quality, but reducing the number of pixels in the image (assuming you stretch it to its pre-crop size,) if you took a 4MP image and cropped it to a center portion, you would not have as good of quality asif you cropped the same frame in a 6MP image. this is the effect that the magnification factor gives. That is it crops the image a certian ammount while not sacrificing image quality. So you dont get the same light loss or depth of feild changes as you would with a longer lens, but the practical effect is the same
-
Wide Angle shooter is disappointed
2003-04-02 11:28:39 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I almost exclusively do outdoor and landscape shots. I'm interested in the current state-of-the-art, but I need FULL FRAME sensors! A 1.6 zoom factor pretty much ruins it for me.
A striped down 1Ds would be perfect. I don't need most of the fancy features. I don't need the high resolution. I need the Full Frame sensor. -
Wide Angle shooter is disappointed -- I know
2003-04-02 13:15:51 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I hear what you're saying, and that's why I spent time in the review covering the focal length issue.
I think we will see larger sensors in more affordable cameras up the road. But for now, you have to spend a lot of money to get a SLR body that preserves the focal lengths of your existing lenses.
In cases such as yours, I'd sit tight for a while and see what happens. -
Wide Angle shooter is disappointed -- I know
2003-04-29 07:51:30 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
the market might go in two ways. Nikon's way is "this will be the standard sensor array size for digitals, and the lens family will adept itself". for that they introduced a lens that goes down to 12mm I think
the other hope is that the manufacturing procedure becomes cheaper and we'll see an EOS 3D or 5D at the price of the 10D or slightly lower around mid 2004. wild speculations of mine, it's not a rumor I heard anywhere, so don't quote this :) -
Wide Angle shooter is disappointed -- I know
2003-07-08 09:55:56 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Wide-angle shooting is also my priority, however with digital cameras we have a way out of the smaller sensor size dilemma:
Instead of shooting a single wide-angle frame, take a number of overlapping frames and stitch them together on your computer. Then resize them to a normal image size (or even leave it as a large imge) and voila, a nice super-wide-angle picture taken using whatever lens(es) you have available at the time.
Remember to think outside the camera with digital!
Granted, it's not an ideal solution, but until we get affordable full-size sensors it's at least a way to achieve the desired results.
Personally I'm chomping at the bit to get myself my first digital SLR, and the 10D sounds like it fits the bill. It helps that I already have a Canon EOS with accessories.
-
10D and Adobe Camera Raw
2003-04-02 08:44:21 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
PC users have found a work around for openning 10D RAW files with Adobe Camera Raw. Have any of the more programming competent Mac users found anything similar for OS 10 users? 10D is great but RAW and ACR is necessary for serious work.
-
Phil Askey's Review Is Now Online
2003-04-01 23:25:44 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Phil Askey, over at dpreview, published his full review of the EOS 10D earlier this week. Phil does a great job of testing camera functionality and performance. And because he tests so many cameras, he has good perspective. If you're seriously considering the 10D, I think it would be worth your time to see what Phil has to say.
-
In stock
2003-04-01 23:02:17 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Any idea where I can get one in a reasonable amount of time? -
In stock -- Yes, Try B&H Photo
2003-04-01 23:20:10 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
B&H Photo lists the 10D as "out of stock," but they have good connections with Canon and are high in the food chain. They've been getting orders out the door in less than 2 weeks. They are very dependable and customer friendly.
-
Depth of Field Button Double Duty
2003-04-01 21:29:23 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
A feature I didn't mention in the article, but one I'm growing more fond of all the time is the "second use" for the depth of field button.
When you have the Canon 550 EX flash attached, or the ST-E2 wireless flash controller with any EX flash, press the depth of field button and th flash fires a series of flashes at 70Hz. It appears to the eye to be a steady light source. This serves an effective "modeling light" that allows you to preview your lighting setup. It's really nice.
-
FireWire
2003-04-01 19:26:57 Michael Brewer | [Reply | View]
The one feature that I think this camera is missing is a FireWire port as opposed to a USB port. I wouldn't want to wait for 6 megapixel images to slither down the length of a USB cable.
With a FireWire port, I'd also hold out hope that I could use my iPod with the camera as a photo archive during long trips instead of taking my iBook with me. -
FireWire
2003-04-11 18:14:11 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
The Nikon high-end models (D1x/h) come with a Firewire port. I'm not 100% sure about the D100 or the high-end Canons, I haven't had the chance to play with any of those. -
FireWire Card Readers
2003-04-03 12:45:51 TomSawyer [Reply | View]
I'm also bothered by the lack of firewire on high end consumer cameras that generate large files and sale receipts.
I found some card readers with firewire so this might be a workable solution for you. Unfortunately I haven't found a firewire card reader that'll accept memorysticks.
FujiFilm
Lexar
Microtech
Sandisk -
FireWire Card Readers - Thanks!
2003-04-03 14:27:51 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
This is very helpful information. Thanks! -
FireWire
2003-04-01 21:22:40 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I especially like the idea of using my iPod for photo storage on the road. I wish you hadn't mentioned it now ;)
As for photo transfer with USB 1.1, or the PC Card adapter for that matter, it isn't too bad. I usually shoot at the highest Jpeg resolution, and those images are 2.4 MBs each. The lower resolutions result in even smaller files.








