iPod as Digital Photographer's Best Friend
by Derrick Story, author of Digital Photography Pocket Guide, 2nd Edition12/02/2003
When I read the first few reviews of the Belkin Media Reader for the iPod, I was mildly intrigued. For the most part, the reviewers seemed to reiterate information that was already posted on Belkin's product page. In other words, you plug the media reader into your iPod, insert a memory card, and upload your pictures to its hard drive.
Based on what I've already discovered in Panther, I figured there had to be more possibilities than that. So I got my hands on the Belkin reader and started testing every scenario I could think of. Bottom line: my hunch was right. You can do a lot with this setup.
What's interesting to me isn't so much that you can upload pictures from a memory card to a portable storage device. As cool as this is, that functionality already exists with other tools. What makes the iPod scenario compelling is that it plugs into Panther, allowing you to leverage some of its powerful technologies. And that's what I'm going to explore here today.
|
|
Before I get to the fun stuff, let's take a look at the actual components, starting with the third generation iPod. Powered by the latest version of its software (version 2.1), this pocket sized FireWire hard drive can play music virtually forever, store text notes, display calendar appointments, record interviews (via the Belkin Voice Recorder), wake you up in the morning, entertain you with games, and, now, store your digital photos. And if you are carrying around the 40 GB model in your camera bag, you can store a lot of photos. (Can you say "three week trip abroad without lugging around a laptop"?)
When you plug a photo-laden iPod into your Mac, both iPhoto and Image Capture automatically recognize it as an input device. Very nice. Just click the "import" button on the capture program of your choice, and you're off to the races.
Photo storage is enabled by the Belkin Media Reader. It's virtually the same height as the iPod and about half again as wide. The Media Reader fits nicely in a camera bag pouch, and its Dock Connector is built into the unit, so you don't have to carry extra cords or adapters: it's all there in one unit. You can upload pictures from CompactFlash (Type 1 and 2), SmartMedia, Secure Digital, Memory Stick, and MultiMediaCards. It's pure plug and play with iPod software 2.1.
While the Media Reader is uploading pictures to your iPod, a green led light blinks to let you know its working away. One reviewer complained that the upload process is slow. That wasn't really an issue for me. The reader took 4:15 minutes to upload 40 6.3 megapixel images (99.7 MBs of content). Not blazing speed, but certainly reasonable. It does like to think about things for a few seconds when you first connect it. But once its ducks are in a row, it does its job without complaint. In my opinion, the Belkin reader works as advertised.
What really makes all of this interesting is Panther, with its array of hidden features including the Rendezvous picture sharing functionality that I wrote about last month. I'm sure you can already see the pieces coming together.
|
|
Serious Storage Power
|
Related Reading
Digital Photography Pocket Guide |
Okay, math time. With a 4-megapixel Canon S400, the average file size is in the neighborhood of 1.3 MB (shooting at the highest quality level). Dividing 1,024 MBs (that is, 1 gigabyte) by 1.3 and I get roughly 788 pictures to one GB of storage. If I set aside just 10 GBs of my iPod's hard disc for images, that means I can store well over 7,000 pictures (4 megapixel at highest quality Jpeg setting).
The iPod stores the pictures by "film roll." That's the same metaphor that iPhoto uses to organize media card uploads. You can scroll through the menu on the iPod and review the basic data for each film roll, including date and time of upload, number of photos, and disc space used.
However, regardless of how many film rolls you have on your iPod, when you upload them to iPhoto, they are considered one big film roll. You have to separate the pictures, if that's necessary, into separate albums after placing them in iPhoto. Bummer.
Personally, I'd prefer that iPhoto preserve the film roll organization as they are stored on the iPod instead of collapsing them into one big film roll. If I were on that fantasy vacation abroad for three weeks, I wouldn't want all of my images uploaded as one film roll. Maybe this is an improvement that we can facilitate through bug reports.
Looking at the pictures in iPhoto, everything seemed normal. The file names were correct, the metadata was intact, and the images looked great. And it only took 2 minutes, 10 seconds for those same 40 pictures (99.7 MB) to upload from the iPod to iPhoto. Ah, the joy of FireWire.
What About RAW and .Mov Files?
Even though Jpegs are the most common digital camera format, they're not the only game in town. Many advanced photographers shoot in RAW mode enabling them to fiddle with the images later without compromising quality.
|
|
I shot a series of pictures in RAW+Jpeg mode with a Canon 10D, then uploaded them to the iPod via the Belkin reader. Image Capture had no problem identifying the RAW images and allowing me to download them. iPhoto could see them but, of course, had no idea what to do with the RAW format.
|
|
So if you shoot RAW, either grab the pictures off your pod via Image Capture or by dragging them out of the DCIM folder located on the device. Either way, the news is good for RAW shooters.
The same holds true for movie files captured with your digital camera. For this test I used a Canon S400 and shot 4 movies. The Belkin Media Reader recognized the movie files and uploaded them to the iPod where they were placed in a new "film roll."
Image Capture displayed the movies as MVI_0000.AVI files,
identifying them as AVI movies, which is correct. I opened the video
clips in QuickTime and both audio and video played perfectly.
As with the RAW files, the movie clips could be dragged directly from the DCIM folder on the iPod to the Desktop or Movie folder on the Mac.
|
|
New Generation Digital Video Cameras
In addition to storing movies from your digital still camera, the iPod should be a great partner to the new generation of digital camcorders that write directly to Flash memory. For example, the Panasonic D-Snap SD Video Camera uses SD memory cards instead of DV tape. If you're shooting full resolution Mpeg2 with a 256MB card, you only have about 5 minutes recording time. In Mpeg4 mode, you get 20 minutes, but that's still not going to get you through an all day event.
If you had the iPod in your camera bag, you could upload one SD card while shooting with another, then alternate. Conceivably you could get through an entire day's worth of recording with just two 256MB cards and your pod. I haven't tested this because I don't have one of these cameras available. But I reviewed the specs, and it should work. If you have direct experience, please post a TalkBack and tell us about it.
Share and Share Alike
Here's where Panther makes things a bit more interesting. You can also share images directly from the iPod to other computers on the local network via Rendezvous. They never have to touch your Mac's hard drive, unless you want them to.
|
|
Simply follow the steps I outlined in my article, Rendezvous Picture Transfer with Panther, but instead of connecting a digital camera to your Mac, connect the iPod. Now anyone on the local network can view all of the pictures you've stored on your iPod and even download the ones they like. So not only does the iPod make picture storage a snap, but plugging it into a Panther Mac makes sharing just as easy.
Burning CDs Directly from the iPod
Next I opened Roxio Toast 5.2.3 and dragged Jpeg, RAW, and movie files directly from the iPod to Toast and burned a disc. It worked just fine, and I didn't have to copy the data to my Mac's hard drive. You could do the same the Panther's built-in burning software.
The advantage here is that you can go straight from iPod to optical media for sharing images, archiving, or for transfering to a desktop computer with a larger hard drive.
Publishing a Web Page from the iPod
Thanks to the versatility of Image Capture, you can also build a web page from selected pictures on your iPod, save it back to your iPod, upload the files to your web server, and, once again, never have a single kb occupy space on your Mac's hard drive. Here's how you do it:
- Upload your pictures from the memory card to the iPod via the Belkin Media Reader.
- Connect the iPod to your Panther Mac and launch Image Capture.
- Create a web page folder on your iPod and tell Image Capture to place the files there.
- Choose "Build a Web Page" as the Automatic Task in Image Capture.
- CMD-select the thumbnails Image Capture is displaying from the iPod, then hit the "Download" button.
|
|
Image Capture will build your web page and save it to your iPod. You can either upload it to your server now or later. It makes no difference because you're carrying around the files in your pocket.
Final Thoughts
Apple has done a good job of letting the world know that you can store thousands of songs in your pocket. Now they can add the claim for thousands of pictures too. For the digital photographer on the go, the iPod can be a valuable addition to the camera bag. It entertains while stuck in airports between flight connections, stores your appointments so you know where to be and when, wakes you up if you oversleep, and stores an entire trip's worth of photos.
Panther users have even more flexibility thanks to the Image Capture app that comes bundled. With it you can share pictures from your iPod over a Rendezvous network, build web page catalogs, or download selected images to your Mac's hard drive.
If you want to work with your pictures directly off the iPod, I recommend that you grab the free image viewing utility, QuickImageCM 2.2. It lets you preview Jpegs at various zoom sizes with a simple ctrl-click (or right-click) of the mouse. This way you don't have to open your image editor or Preview every time you want to see what a picture looks like.
Even though the Belkin Media Reader isn't a speed demon, it works great and adds a new dimension to the iPod that is sure to be adored by digital photographers everywhere. Remember to keep a set of AAA batteries on hand in case your reader runs out of gas in the field.
After working with this setup, only one question remains. Why would any Mac photographer even consider another MP3 player?
Derrick Story is the author of The Photoshop CS4 Companion for Photographers, The Digital Photography Companion, and Digital Photography Hacks, and coauthor of iPhoto: The Missing Manual, with David Pogue. You can follow him on Twitter or visit www.thedigitalstory.com.
Return to the Mac DevCenter
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a talkback.
Showing messages 1 through 36 of 36.
-
Great Idea, Incomplete Product
2003-12-13 13:27:56 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
All I can say is... where the heck is the memory stick pro support??? a product like this is most useful for flash memory that costs a bundle for a decent amount. As soon as it supports Pro, I buy it in a heartbeat.
-
What happens with the file time stamps after transfering ?
2003-12-12 12:06:10 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
I've got a python script that names all my photos with the date and time as the file name based on the files creation timestamp. Does doing this extra step mean that you end up with the same timestamp once you've got it on your mac as when the photo was taken or does it flip to the upload time ?
-
Card reader
2003-12-12 08:13:21 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Would any card reader work to upload pictures from CF card to the iPod or does it have to be a Belkin? If so why? -
RE: Card reader
2003-12-12 10:46:44 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
My understanding is, that at the moment only the Belkin works. Software and so forth aside, the Belkin only works with 3rd Gen iPods with the special dock connector, which isn't available on other readers.
-
Only one type of reader
2003-12-12 07:54:24 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Hi, many profewssional photographers only use one type of storage cards, perhaps a nice was to reduce cost, size, weight would be for Belkin to create readers for each type of card separate...
-
RE: Only one type of reader
2003-12-12 10:49:46 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Yeah, except, I don't see this as being big with pros yet. Other improvements will be more important to them, such as upload speed.
But I do think that for existing owners of 3G iPods, this is a nice goodie. If you have your iPod with you anyway, why not back up, or store your digi photos while on the go?
-
Why does this require a special media reader?
2003-12-06 10:30:34 smithkennedy [Reply | View]
I was actually disappointed that this capability required a "special" device. I had long wondered why there weren't FireWire drivers built-in to the iPod's firmware to allow FireWire (and now USB) media readers to be plugged in and just used. Wasn't this one of the promises of FireWire, that it is a true peer-to-peer data bus?
Sometimes a Palm or an iPod or whatever is a peripheral of another device, other times it is the host of other peripherals. When it is connected to a Mac or PC, it should be a peripheral. But when a user connects an iPod to a standard FireWire CompactFlash or whatever media reader, it should be smart enough to recognize that the user wants the media reader to be a peripheral of the iPod, and do what it would do with the Belkin media reader. This is the kind of "value-added" capability that would benefit users and make others more interested in the iPod. Having to buy a media reader that requires its own batteries, costs $100, and is redundant when the user probably already has another media reader they use with their computer, is kind of a disappointment. It certainly doesn't capitalize on one of the core strengths of FireWire.
-
What if the battery is exhausted after 1 year
2003-12-04 23:51:15 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Have a look around what will happen when you need a new battery, it's a rip off, roundabout 200 $. Sorry, give me the option to change the battery like on my Canon 10D.... -
What if the battery is exhausted after 1 year
2003-12-07 16:36:09 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Sorry, but you need to stop believing everything you read and try doing some of your own research from MULTIPLE sources, not just some punk kids trying to get attention.
I own a 30GB iPod and an original 5GB iPod which I have given to my wife. I have yet to experience any battery problems, despite the original 5GB iPod being close to two years old. No problems with either iPod. Besides, if I ever did have any problems, you can buy a replacement battery for $30-50 and replace it yourself, have Apple replace it for ~$100, or invest in an extended warranty plan from CompUSA or Best Buy for $30-70. -
What if the battery is exhausted after 1 year
2003-12-05 14:22:11 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Apple does provide a service so you can change your battery. You can read the details here. The service costs $99.00 USD: including labor, parts, and a 90-day guarantee on materials and workmanship, plus $6.95 shipping.
-
Why iPod?!?!?
2003-12-03 11:55:38 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Or... you could get a device with media card and FULL COLOR screen and editing and recording BUILT IN.
Rich media on an iPod?!? It's like watching monkeys learn to type!
Lyra
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00008VFCU/
Archos AV
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00009XFVT/
Archos GMINI
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0000UJH36/
FlashTrax
http://www.smartdisk.com/Products/DigitalMultimedia/FlashTrax.asp
Vosonic
http://www.vosonic.co.uk/vmp3h.html
Sony GigaPocket
http://www.i4u.com/article821.html
Avias MEC
http://www.iavias.com/eng/product-mec-deluxe.htm
MP3OK Jukebox ET970
http://www.mp3ok.com/et970.htm
GenSoc MJB-3100
http://www.gemsoc.com.tw/pro_mjb3100.asp
Top 10 Multimedia Players
http://www.i4u.com/article688.html
List of Personal Video Players
http://shanebrinkmandavis.com/homepage/JBMM/Competition/
-
iPod for camcorder
2003-12-03 10:55:47 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Forget the memory stick. The iPod would be a great hard disk recorder of digital video simply by using the Firewire connector.
You know, just plug your DV camcorder's Firewire output directly into the iPod. You'd get over two hours of digital video on a 40gig iPod.
I'm not sure what is preventing this from being a reality.
Any clues?
-
the dream iPod...
2003-12-03 10:45:03 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
... is getting closer.
On recent travels, I've carried a camcorder (Sony with still camera built-in, using memory sticks), an old Palm IIIx with the little folding keyboard, and a laptop. Using the Palm/keyboard for journals, I realized that the only reason I was schlepping the laptop was to back-up the Palm and to dump photos into it from the memory stick.
I thought, if only the iPod could back up the Palm, as well as to store and display photos, I'd no longer have to schlep the laptop around the world.
It looks like this set-up brings us close. Perhaps the iPod could come with a PC-card slot for the memory reader of choice. A color screen for viewing photos, and some sort of true Palm integration (or maybe a connection for the old folding Palm keyboards), and my pack can be 7 pounds lighter.
----
Obbie -
the dream iPod...
2003-12-03 11:20:07 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Picture viewing exist today on the PC side with color LCD screen, at less than the current iPod price with comparable drive space. Apple should move quickly to make the iPod with color and picture viewing capabilities or loose market share.
You can only be "too cool" for so long before the competition with better features passes you by. -
the dream iPod...
2003-12-03 11:16:08 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Speaking as another Palm IIx owner...
Some people already do what you are looking for. I was researching digital photo storage and on a photo forum there were several photographers who liked using certain Windows-based handhelds because they could get both a large drive for storage and a decent color screen for image reviewing. There are a few photographer-oriented utilities written for these Windows handhelds to do things like check those RAW files up close to see which ones are in focus. Nothing quite like that on the Mac side yet.
-
Does this work with Windows?
2003-12-03 10:42:20 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
So does this work with Windows? If you have an iPod on Windows, use the Belkin Reader, do you just drag the images onto your PC similar to how you drag the RAW files to the Mac in the article since you don't have iPhoto on the PC. -
RE: Does this work with Windows?
2003-12-03 10:54:39 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I'd like to see a post from a Windows user with this setup.
One of the key points of this article is not so much how the Belkin is a big deal, other than it provides the means to plug memory cards into the iPod, but more how a photo-laden iPod can interact with Panther on a Mac. For me, that's the real fun.
Windows XP has some nice digital photography functionality. Maybe we'll get lucky and a reader will show us what tricks can be done there with an iPod.
-
Awsome!
2003-12-03 09:44:48 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
This is exactly the justification for a decent color screen on the iPod. You could then transfer your pictures to the iPod to store them, or preview the pictures, or watch a slide show (with music or narration of course). It wouldn't cost much more, but everyone with a digital camera is going to want one.
The only major decision Apple will have to make is which memory card to support (CompactFlash, SmartMedia, Secure Digital, Memory Stick, or MultiMediaCards). A 6-1 multi-device is probably too big for the iPod, so maybe 2 or 3 models may be needed (match the camera or PDA that you own). Or they can try to pick or force one standard.
I hope Apple comes out with this soon... -
Awsome!
2003-12-03 10:17:20 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
"This is exactly the justification for a decent color screen on the iPod. You could then transfer your pictures to the iPod to store them, or preview the pictures, or watch a slide show (with music or narration of course). It wouldn't cost much more, but everyone with a digital camera is going to want one."
Most cameras already have this functionality!
* decent color screen
* storage
* preview
* slideshow playback
I just don't understand the hype. -
Awsome!
2003-12-03 11:10:19 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
"Most cameras already have this functionality!"
Sure, but what we're talking about here is really MASS storage, like being away on an extended trip. I took film on my last trip because it was not economically feasible to store mass 5MP+ images digitally without a laptop. These new devices change that. Besides, you might want to save your camera battery for shooting, not image management.
Occasional point-and-shoot people with 3MP cameras should be real happy with a few memory cards, but if you need to shoot the digital equivalent of many rolls of film in a short time period, you gotta have one of these massive hard drives. -
RE: Awesome!
2003-12-03 10:48:21 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Well, I don't think this is just hype. Instead, it seems to me that we're watching the evolution of digital photography. Devices such as FlashTrax, iPod, and others help lengthen the leash to our computers.
Digital cameras are great input devices. But I think there is a need for intermediate storage devices that also have other useful functions. An iPod or FlashTrax fits much better in my digital camera bag than a 15" TiBook.
And like the early stages of any new technology, we're seeing a few bumps in the road. As some readers have noted, the Belkin isn't the fastest gun in the west. But, personally, I find this all very interesting, and it adds to my fascination with digital photography.
-
Another MP3 player
2003-12-03 09:11:35 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
"Why would any Mac photographer even consider another MP3 player?"
Because another player might have a built-in card reader, a color screen for reviewing images in the field, and video out. That's why I'm thinking about buying a SmartDisk FlashTrax instead of an iPod. Hard drives start at 30GB and it does play MP3s (but probably not as elegantly as an iPod). The FlashTrax looks more like a photographer's best friend that plays music, while the iPod looks more like a music fan's best friend that sort of handles photos. -
Another MP3 player
2003-12-10 08:56:13 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Flash Trax is an interesting product. It probably uses a larger (physical) hard drive than the iPod, so the capacity (80GB) is bigger and also probably cheaper, but the size and weight {5.63 in X 3.62 1.26 in (143mm X 92mm X 32mm) 12 oz (340g)}makes it large for a pocket device. It does have a decent size color screen. At the moment, these are probably the types of trade-offs that are necessary. Hopefully, price, size, weight, etc. can be cut in half and running time, capacity, screen resolution, etc. can double.
-
Another MP3 player
2003-12-03 09:26:19 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Indeed, the FlashTrax looks cool. I like that they made a mass storage device so it doesn't need any additional drivers. Very smart.
The 40 GB model retails for $549 US, which is about $50 cheaper than a 40 GB iPod with the additional Belkin reader. So it's right there in price hunt.
The reason why I like the iPod for the "Mac photographer," is because it so well integrates with the operating system and will continue to evolve. Just recently we saw the addition of voice recording and media storage. Other features such as calendaring, data back up, iSync, etc., make the pod an extension of the Mac itself.
So it really depends on what type of computer user you are and your primary needs. For me, I'm deeply involved in many aspects of my Mac, and the iPod complements my style nicely. If your focus is more digital photography and less Mac computing in general, the FlashTrax could be an excellent choice.
If you get one, let us know what you think!
-
It's *slow*
2003-12-02 18:43:18 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
Beware! It is slow!
If you transfer a lot of images the ipod will run out of power before the transfer completes.
Look at the following two links for more info:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1023&message=6403600
and
http://www.ipodlounge.com/ipodnews_comments.php?id=P1750_0_7_0_C -
RE: It's *slow*
2003-12-02 19:24:39 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Yes, the upload times were stated in this article. I don't think you have to worry about the iPod running out of power using this device, unless that is, the battery is already low when you commence the upload.
I would, however, use good batteries, preferably rechargeable ones, in the Belkin Reader. I think it's primarily designed for 128 MB cards and below, although 256 MB cards work fine, given a little extra time for transfer. Uploading a full 512 MB card can be painful, and probably not a good idea unless you have fresh batteries in the Belkin.
All of that being said, I like the Belkin, am using it, and am having fun exploring the new uses for the iPod, as illustrated in the article. -
RE: It's *slow*
2003-12-03 05:48:02 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
The users with the most need for secondary photo storage are currently those with a digital SLR. A 512mb or 1gb memory card is a 'must' here.
Designing the media reader for 128mb will make it obsolete when the next generation of high-megapixel compact cameras hit the shelves.Even today, using a 5 megapixel compact camera with a 128mb memory card is not optimal.
So what do you have now? A device designed for people who infrequently need to store a few pictures.
A more sensible choice for those people would be to simply buy a larger 512mb memory card - about the same price and the same capacity as with 4 'belkin uploads'.
Sorry, but I do not see this device fulfilling the needs, but for a few select users. -
RE: It's *slow*
2003-12-04 15:26:32 anonymous2 [Reply | View]
There is an entire class of digital photographers who would benefit from the Belkin reader - serious amateurs and "prosumers". People who burn through 100-200MB of storage on a typical day of sightseeing and picture-taking. Sure, these people could just get an extra 512MB card for the same price as the Belkin reader, but that card would only last them an extra day. What happens when you go away for a long weekend? Or when you go away on vacation for a week? Or for six weeks as I just was? It is most certainly worth $100 to have an almost limitless supply of image storage and the freedom to leave your laptop at home or not have to shell out an extra $400-500 for a portable storage device like the FlashTrac.
And one last thing, who says the Belkin is designed for 128MB cards? It's more accurate to say that it is designed for users who will only need to clear off their memory cards about once a day - people for whom its not a problem to let their 512MB card upload while they're eating dinner or watching TV. Oh, and one last last thing. Cameras are hitting a practical ceiling for resolution - there is a certain point beyond which extra pixels are pointless, and todays cameras are almost there. IMHO, the ceiling for consumer cameras is 5MP, 10MP for prosumer, and 16MP for professional. So, I don't think you'll see consumer cameras getting much higher in resolution. -
RE: It's *slow*
2003-12-03 09:12:48 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Well, I think you made your point. And it seems like you have a plan that works for you. That's great!
For me, I'm not going to throw the Belkin out with the bath water. Upload speed is not *the only* issue for me. If it were, I would not have even bothered with Mac OS X for the first year of its existence.
What I think is interesting, and is the point of this article (as stated in the intro) is how the Belkin transforms the iPod into a new device, that I think is useful for many photographers now, and will only become more so in the future as improvements are made.
I still shoot with 256 MB cards often. I've uploaded data from them to the iPod, and it's fine. I'm a multitasking person and move right to the next thing, such as changing camera batteries, while the files are uploading.
This doesn't work for you. That's cool. I think we've covered this aspect sufficiently so readers can decide what's best for their needs.
Thanks for your posts! -
RE: 2008 -- Is the Belkin Media Reader still viable?
2008-05-19 13:32:15 marde [Reply | View]
I've been searching for information to help me decide whether the iPod (especially iPod Touch) could be a viable portable image storage device for traveling. I shoot a Canon 30D (typically RAW - CR2 files). I briefly had an Epson P-3000, which unfortunately, was stolen. It had a beautiful 4" screen, is easy to use (simply insert the CF card) and reads my RAW files. It also plays MP3 & movies (which are 'bells & whistles functions to me), but lacks internet function which is something I'd appreciate more. I can replace the Epson with another one, but am attracted to the more compact (thinner, lighter) design of the iPod Touch, as well as the internet functions, which would make it even easier to travel without my laptop.
I just read the fairly enthusiastic review you wrote in 2003 (5 years ago!) of the Belkin Media Reader for the iPod as a way of doing just what I suggested. I've been trying to determine (a) if the media reader will work with the iPod Touch in the manner you describe here, and (b) if there is any simpler, more compact way of accomplishing this. (The B. Reader + iPod nearly equals the Epson viewers in bulk.) Actually, it is difficult to get an accurate dimension reading on the Belkin reader. Sites vary in their specs considerably.
I will likely go back to the Epson unless I can find a way to make the iPod Touch work with my system. I'm hoping you can offer some more current advice.













Thank you...todd (on a PC)