Tiger Presents New Opportunities for Developers
by Derrick Story11/16/2004
I recently had a good phone conversation with Chris Bourdon, the senior product line manager for the Tiger project at Apple Computer. A few days later he was the opening speaker at the O'Reilly Mac OS X Conference.
In his feature presentation, "The Tiger Project," Chris provided an inside look at where the Tiger project stands now, and discussed some of its most promising technologies. For those of you who weren't able to attend the conference, I'm going to cover the highlights from his talk, plus incorporate some additional information gleaned from our phone call.
Tiger: A New Level of Innovation
Panther has provided us with a modern, stable operating system. Now that this foundation is built, Apple has been able to put even more energy into innovation on the platform.
I asked Chris to highlight the new technologies he thought would be of particular interest to the O'Reilly audience. Here are highlights of what he discussed.
Spotlight. This technology enables comprehensive search across the whole OS and its applications. Apple is tapping the metadata and content on the hard drive with their very fast index engines to create powerful but nimble search. Plus it's highly extensible so developers can use this technology for their own ideas. And this is a key concept: you can build Spotlight into your application using the Spotlight APIs. Unix users also have command-line access to Spotlight. And there will even be Smart Folders that can store your results and dynamically update as you change the data on your hard drive.
Dashboard. Here's another approach to providing you with access to the information you want quickly, this time through the use of widgets. Dashboard organizes all your widgets, allows you to select which widgets are visible, and provides you with a mechanism using a hot key or mouse gesture for quickly activating and deactivating Dashboard.
The cool thing about widgets is that you can easily build your own, or choose from the hundreds that I think will be developed by others. Most likely we're going to see all sorts of uses for this in education, business, and shared environments. Apple will provide many pre-built widgets in the Tiger release. Developers will be able to create feature-rich applications with these tools.
64-bit Computation. 64-bit application development comes of age in Tiger. Apple is making it easier to take advantage of the powerful Mac hardware that's available now. With Tiger we'll most likely see a proliferation of 64-bit apps. What's cool though, is that 64-bit and 32-bit applications can live side by side. Plus the 32-bit apps will run as fast or faster than they do today. So there's no performance penalty associated with added 64-bit support. Developers can create 32-GUIs that tap powerful 64-bit computation, all in the same environment.
Xgrid. The Xgrid client is included in every version of Tiger. This presents tremendous power in environments with lots of Macs. Conceivably, even spare cycles on an admin workstation could be used to help with computationally intense activities.
Chris Bourdon spoke at the recent Mac OS X Conference in Santa Clara, Calif. He provided the audience with an updated overview of Tiger's tantalizing features.
Syncing. The popularity of iSync has caught the attention of developers, making embedded synching high on the feature "request list" for Tiger. So not only will syncing be built into the OS, developers will be able to use Apple's technology for their own applications. It is improved and runs faster than before. Plus, the sync engine is extensible, enabling users to add their own preferences. This means Mail, System Preferences, and other core applications will be able to sync.
Core Media Technologies. Core Audio is very fast, with low latency and high resolution. It takes advantage of a technology called "audio units" that allows developers to add effects that become part of the overall Core Audio system. Any application that calls these units in the system can put them to use within the program. Core Image is accelerated image processing that allows similar flexibility for developers. Plus, Core Image taps the processing power of today's amazing graphics cards and doesn't need to unnecessarily tax the CPU.
Automator. This is more than just AppleScript. Automator is drag-and-drop application development using pre-built actions that you can string together to create a workflow. Not only does Automator simplify the process of building AppleScripts to streamline production, developers can use it to create whole new applications.
The Importance of Developer Feedback
No doubt, Apple has assembled topnotch engineers who have both talent and vision. So many of their ideas spawn from the energy of these interactions. But Chris also discussed during the phone interview how Apple relies heavily on the independent developer community outside of Cupertino.
A top-of-mind example was the evolution of the synching functionality. Apple provided iSync, which allowed synchronization among its computers and many devices, such as PDAs, smartphones, the iPod, etc. It's also a popular feature of .Mac. But the developer community wanted to be able to incorporate this technology into their apps too, taking this functionality to a new level. That was great feedback, and Apple is making its synching technology available in Tiger as a result.
These interactions with developers are important to maintaining the vitality of the platform.
Tiger in Comparison to Longhorn and Linux on the Desktop
Many of us believe that Mac OS X is driving innovation on the desktop. Apple has made the transition to its modern operating system and can now focus on elevating the platform to new heights in computing. At the same time, it appears that Microsoft is still years away from making the transition, let alone refining it.
Chris thinks that some pundits in technology look at the desktop possibilities with Linux and they get excited. But in reality, Apple has most of those possibilities already built-in to Mac OS X. Plus users have the convenience of plug-and-play, refined productivity apps, excellent UI, and much more.
In the end, many people view Mac OS X on the desktop as the best of both worlds.
The Pace of Innovation
During the phone conversation with Chris, I mentioned that many of the developers here at O'Reilly Media also agree that Mac OS X is the best of both worlds. But I sometimes wonder how long Apple can keep up this tremendous pace of innovation. Since 2001, Apple has blown away the competition in this regard. So I asked Chris what makes him optimistic, if indeed he is, that Apple can maintain this pace?
Chris replied that innovation is at the core of everything they do at Apple. Mac OS X v10.4, Tiger, will be the most important release for developers since Mac OS X was first released in 2001.
In his view Tiger is loaded with a number of cutting-edge technologies that translate into new and interesting opportunities for almost every type of developer. In fact, developers working with prerelease versions of Tiger -- ADC Select and Premier members -- are already finding innovative ways to use the powerful new features, APIs, and frameworks. The latest Tiger build just became available for these developers to deliver innovative new applications when Tiger ships in the first half of 2005.
Final Thoughts
I suspect that Tiger will be popular with current Mac users. But I think the real benefit of Mac OS X 10.4 will be realized as users discover the massive new wave of innovative, Tiger-ready applications from independent developers, many of whom are working with prerelease versions of Tiger right now. I think 2005 is going to be a great year for the Mac.
Derrick Story is the author of The Photoshop CS4 Companion for Photographers, The Digital Photography Companion, and Digital Photography Hacks, and coauthor of iPhoto: The Missing Manual, with David Pogue. You can follow him on Twitter or visit www.thedigitalstory.com.
Return to MacDevCenter.com.
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a talkback.
Showing messages 1 through 56 of 56.
-
Tiger Starter Kit
2004-11-16 18:18:00 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Unless you've lost your DSL connection and misplaced your laptop, you've probably heard that Apple is offering the Tiger Starter Kit to help you start developing the next generation of Mac OS X applications today. We think this is a good program, and O'Reilly Media has purchased a couple of these kits. -
Tiger Starter Kit
2004-11-21 16:01:04 RainyDayMagazine [Reply | View]
I can see paying $500 for the Starter Kit if you have a commercial app that needs to be ported to the platform or to incorporate the new features...it's a bit steep if you just want to play around with these new core tech.
I think Apple would be better served when they introduce brand new tech to make the Starter Kits freely available for download. They don't have to support the folks that download for free...just let them play with the tech. Perhaps they will come up with some cool stuff by the time the OS update is actually released. -
Tiger Starter Kit
2004-12-22 13:31:18 scottellsworth [Reply | View]
I doubt they would be well served by giving away the dev kits before the OS is ready. It would result in a lot of people using the new technologies before those new technologies really quite work. Developers would come away thinking of Core Data, or other new tech, as slow, broken, or buggy. It will likely be none of those things once it is done.
Further, Apple does the pre-releases to let developers discover stopship bugs, so they want developers with a commitment. It takes time to install, time to use, and time to file worthwhile bugs. Sadly, dilettantes rarely have that much time to spare. Not a negative comment on student developers, part time developers, and dilettantes, just an observation on how much free time you are likely to have to do this testing and bug reporting.
The operating system is not done yet. When it is, the dev tools will be free for anyone who buys the OS. That is the best time to play with the new technologies, as they will likely work. You can then spend your limited time and energy writing software, rather than trying to figure out why Tiger just ate your data.
Scott
-
CoreData
2004-11-17 07:59:38 monkeyt [Reply | View]
I'm amazed at how many of these Tiger overviews overlook what I would consider to be one of the most important developer-aimed improvements in OS X: Core Data.
It simplifies the handling of complex relational data in memory (and connecting it to your interface) to such an extent that it's practically effortless. It also standardizes importing and exporting this data as XML docs, binary data or to a SQLite compatible file format, and provides undo/redo capability for your data automatically.
Developers just got some incredible nifty functionality added to their toolbelt. -
Re: Core Data
2004-11-17 08:26:08 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
Core Data is very, very important. No arguments here. The problem is we can't talk about it much because Apple hasn't lifted the NDA on that info. I do appreciate the link you included in your talkback. I encourage folks to look at the section on Core Data. There's a slick diagram there.
I will tell you this though, once we're free to write about Core Data, we'll have a great series of articles for you... -
CoreData
2004-11-18 06:00:13 PaulSavary [Reply | View]
Yes, Core Data is certainly one of the most important new technologies for developers in Tiger. This is really a dramatic addition to Cocoa, adding many new services like "declarative" and scalable object persistence and state management, and much more...
It is interesting to see how Cocoa, which was mainly perceived as a GUI framework, is quickly extending its reach to many other areas. From what I see, Apple is pushing for Core Data a lot toward us developers under NDA.
Public information about Core Data is scarce but I recommend this page at Cocoadev, which contains public information available about it.
-
sync
2004-11-17 22:38:23 sporter [Reply | View]
When Apple makes sync open so other applications can use it I sure hope they also make it open so 3rd parties can implement their own sync servers. (Or build sync services into OS X Server.) -
sync
2004-11-18 15:27:00 OtisWild [Reply | View]
I think the other way 'round would be super handy too:
A public API so that 3rd party device vendors can code sync 'drivers' for their devices.
Then perhaps we'll see a proper iSync interface for the PhatBox instead of the hacky kludges there are now?
Frankly, the sync function in iTunes should be migrated to iSync for consistency's sake. At least for the OS X version.
-
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-11-18 10:41:38 pkonigsberg [Reply | View]
I'm thinking of buying a mac but wonder if I should just wait till 10.4 comes out, or do you think Apple would allow a recent (2 or 3 months before 10.4 release) mac buyer a free upgrade to 10.4? -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-11-18 15:26:10 OtisWild [Reply | View]
I would wait.
Apple is pretty obnoxious in this area, so I would definitely wait until at the very least they offer free upgrade vouchers in the box if their new HW doesn't ship with X.4.
Frankly I think they should just go with 'X' (the letter, not the Roman numeral) with a version number, instead of prolonging this 10.x.y stuff. I mean, each of these 'sub versions' rank (and are priced) as version releases due to new apps, features and fframework/APIs.... -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-11-23 06:09:26 Rahbyrt [Reply | View]
Buy it now.
Conventional wisdom says never buy the first release of any Apple OS upgrade unless you want the bugs that were missed in Apple's rush-to-market. Software Smarties will say wait for the first revision of the upgrade, such as Tiger 10.4.2 .
Of-course by then we'll have news that OSX 10.5 "Cheetah" is scheduled to be released in 6-months, and maybe we should wait for that...
...and so continues the infamous Apple infinite loop of operating system introductions.
So just buy it now. -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-12-07 02:02:32 TriangleJuice [Reply | View]
Mac OS X 10.5 won't be Cheetah, because that was the codename of OS 10 10.0.
My guess is Lynx ;-) -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-12-28 18:51:52 new_convert [Reply | View]
Agreed. I wasted much time in prolonging my "switch" from the M$ world. Once I was introduced to Panther I have been kicking myself ever since for not making the leap sooner. My wife and kids still run their Windows boxes but they are becoming converts too. Tiger may be the latest and greatest when released and more than likely worth the upgrade, but I am more than confident that you will not be disappointed with Pather and the overall Mac experience. -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-11-19 03:03:41 Sandman619 [Reply | View]
Apple usually offers recent owners the chance to purchase the newer OS for $19.95; their cost for the CD & shipping. I think that they usually extend that offer 3 to 6 months into the past. Usually, once the release date is announced, they will include the upgrade offer for new customers. This way, they don't suffer a lag in sales between the announcement and the on-shelf date.
A developer friend of mine is test-driving the deloper release and said that Tiger is definitely worth the upgrade. -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-11-30 16:09:23 iwantiger [Reply | View]
Well after speaking with a manager at one of the Mac stores I am going to wait for the Tiger release from its cage (10.4.1). Why you ask? The following is based on the information I got from the Apple manager: If I ever have to or want to re-install the OS from scratch, I would first have to install the original OS that came with the computer (45 minutes or longer) then first re-install OS 10.4 Tiger (even more time).
Also all new operating systems have bugs to be worked out. The manager told me within one month the bugs should all be resolved. And so I guess I have to wait for the OS 10.4.2 or the second release of Tiger.
Note: I am new to the Mac world of computing. I have decided my next computer to be a Mac G5. I want everything in the computer to be 64 Bit and take full advantage of the unmatched 64 Bit processing only found in the new Mac G5 computers. I have read all this is on this sting and there is allways a flip side to the coin. Hats off to Macintosh. As far as I know all tech suppoert if anyone would ever need it is located in the "good old USA". It is not out-sourced overseas to save money like so many PC companies are presently doing.
I have recently researched computer companies. Everything from buying the right computer to their tech support. Just try getting tech support from a PC company. You may be talking with someone in the far east or somewhere far far away with a native thick accent that can be very difficult and frustrating to understand.
Thanks all, iwantiger -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-12-04 15:41:28 scottbrown3 [Reply | View]
Actually, the part about re-installing isn't true, unless it is brand new with Tiger. I have an iBook and several Pismo (G-3) PowerBooks, and I installed Panther on them without having to resintall the original shipping OS first. I would expect the same with Tiger. You may want to check another source on this. In anycase, it is usually a mistake to play the waiting game because there is ALWAYS something new in the wings, just waiting a few months before being released.
Other than that you will be very, very pleased with your Mac. I've switched quite a few people and not one of them ever wants to go back to Windows.
Scott -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-12-09 02:33:49 NordicMan [Reply | View]
I usually wait for installing a new version of the Mac OS. But if you have what you wish to keep backed up, then you should get along all right. I still just find it simpler to wait. But I would not wait long for a new Mac. Panther is quite good.
It sounds odd, the idea of having to install the original OS, then the newer one. Why?
I got a G5, and am quite happy with it. It is supposed to be that come January Apple will have a PCI express graphic slot, with PCI X slots. We shall see. New motherboard for that is needed.
It seems like it would be a while before everything is 64 bit. But people may well be more knowledgeable than me. So many developers/supplier-vendors have 32 bit programmes, and they will have to run side by side with the newer programmes from developers. It is hard to imagine Adobe and Quark being quick about getting 64 bit support in good fashion, when so many of their customers will have 32 bit OSs.
May you find much enjoyment and fertile use of your new Mac. -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-11-21 10:20:15 alarzaga [Reply | View]
Since OS upgrades generally go for $20 for recent buyers of their hardware, and assuming that Tiger is released sometime in January, then a better question is whether it is worth waiting 2-3 months for $20.
-
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-11-24 05:12:37 MACMAN [Reply | View]
I wish they would,
I have writen to APPLE twice regarding allowing people who have purchased an apple computer within 6 months of the new Operating System being released, a free upgrade.
Quite simply the answer is no.
However ( TIGER ) is supposed to be for G5 macs, so unless you have a G5 you should not need it, further more the most important parts of the OS are ( security, classic compatibilty, speed and stability ), and from what I have seen from TIGER these area's are the same. -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2004-12-02 03:29:46 Boondoggle [Reply | View]
Tiger is not just for G5s!!! It will be a huge upgrade for G4 users as well!! I can't wair for it on my Powerbook. Where do you get this stuff? Tiger is feature rich: new Mail, new iChat, Spotlight is a huge feature... just to name a few. How about Quartz 2D Extreme? And I've got news for you, Classic compatibiliy is going to become less and less important in the coming years. In fact it already is much less important thatn it was a year ago, not to mention 3 years... -
OSX 10.4 upgrade
2005-03-25 09:46:43 H.M.Seiden [Reply | View]
I feel your pain my out there, my brother or sister Mac user!
I, too am considering a G5 tower (my G3 B&W 400MHz is just slow, but knock on wood has not had a major glitch since I put in a new power module 2 years ago). Thanks for a great ride on this one Apple but if I can hold out suspect that before WWDC (read May) we will see Tiger on the street.
It just irks me to fork over another $200 (less than what my old B&W is worth today!) to update to Tiger. This would be the case if I gave Apple $3K for a new desktop and display now (three months before Tiger).
So, guess what? I'm waiting just like the rest of you. Will lagging sales motivate Apple? It'd better! I don't see Apple raising the street product of the hardware that's been out since 2004 to compensate early PPC adopters, do you? Have they ever?
-
Dashboard lowers the bar considerably
2004-11-18 23:42:52 tonywilliams [Reply | View]
While looking over the technologies that Apple will be introducing with Tiger there are many, including Spotlight and CoreData (as someone has already pointed out), that may excite Cocoa capable developers I think Dashboard will be the one that provides the best opportunities for the rest of us.
If you examine what Apple has already publically told us about how they Widgets will be developed we know that the interface is done using HTML with the help of CSS and that the back end programming start with JavaScript.
OK, at the moment if we examine some publically available Widgets (you can see some at Dashboarder) then you will see that serious work requires a small Cocoa app to gain access to the facilities of the operating system.
However this may well not last long, already there is one version of a terminal for the dashboard. How long before someone gives us a Widget that allows a Perl script or shell command?
Then the HTML interface is a lot easier to build than a Cocoa one in a more traditional application. Here in Sydney, Australia a small developer such as myself looking to find someone who is a good interface designer with Cocoa ability is difficult, if not impossible, and expensive. One capable of using HTML and CSS is easier and cheaper to find.
The easy interface and scripting makes trying something out, an ad hoc application, much easier. The lower entry cost of Dashboard will see some tremendous innovation and some marvelous new capabilities for our Macs - just wait and see.
Tony Williams
-
More on Dashboard...
2004-11-19 07:56:09 Derrick Story |
[Reply | View]
I agree. I think there will be tremendous opportunity to build cool, useful items with Dashboard that other Mac users would want to have. And along those lines, I think Automator provides similar possibilities. If you've been sitting on a good idea, now is the time to look at these tools and start thinking about bringing it to reality.
-
why i am sorry to have a mac for nearly 20 years.
2004-11-20 12:46:16 robbenoord [Reply | View]
I am buying my 5th mac!!
But after 20 years I still have to use my windows Pc
to order tickets etc or to watch cams on the net.
It's becoming a real pain in the neck!! -
why i am sorry to have a mac for nearly 20 years.
2004-11-21 10:42:10 lyradius [Reply | View]
I think even Apple has missed the open source browser FIREFOX.
Safari shows me garbage when I accidently turn of a required font.
When I sue IE or Safari, Yahoo games says "This game cannot be played on Macs or Unix" This is not the case when I use the Firefox browser on a mac. I play those games just fine dispite their "announcement".
I suggest the same might be true with your ticket problem.
By the way , I hope Tiger addresse the Safari font problem. Why doesn't FIREFOX have this problem?
segmented resources are not all that bad sometimes I suspect.
-
why i am sorry to have a mac for nearly 20 years.
2004-11-22 16:43:13 gman226 [Reply | View]
i have only had a MAC (G5) for 8 months. love the machine!. But I can't stand seeing things that are not compatible with the mac on the i net. i figured they'd have that figured out!
Frank -
why i am sorry to have a mac for nearly 20 years.
2004-12-02 11:31:53 Dohboy [Reply | View]
While I don't know which sites you're talking about or the specific circumstances I have 2 responses. Generally speaking, compatibility is not something that needs figuring out but simply implementing.
Just 2 days ago I was at a site requiring Windows and Explorer and yet I signed up and paid my bills from a Mac using Safari. So at least some sites claim to exclude Mac but don't really. -
why i am sorry to have a mac for nearly 20 years.
2004-12-03 06:50:26 jamessbarrett@snet.net [Reply | View]
I have found that by turning on Safari's debug menu, and switching my user agent to IE when I encounter an incompatible web site, many sites will work flawlessly.
I then usually send the webmaster of that site an email, letting him know that Safari works ... -
i am not sorry for having a mac, but...
2004-11-23 05:02:29 mandrake69 [Reply | View]
I'm using only macs at home and at work and have very few incompatibility issues on the i-net (I'm using Safari and Opera). But the real pain in the neck is the poor compatibility between OS X and OS 9. Why I always see garbage on the USB flash drive (or zip-drive) written in OS9 when open it in OS X (and vice versa)? -
why i am sorry to have a mac for nearly 20 years.
2004-11-23 17:41:55 smith34m [Reply | View]
Get yourself a copy of Virtual PC. Windows runs better on a Mac than on an Intel machine. And loook at the bright side... on the Mac you have no virus issues, pop-ups, spyware, etc.. -
why i am sorry to have a mac for nearly 20 years.
2004-12-03 16:46:14 meefee [Reply | View]
Better?! That's ridiculous, it's been slow as hell on my dual G5! My 300 MHz laptop works way faster than this piece of crap! -
why i am sorry to have a mac for nearly 20 years.
2004-12-04 12:00:12 nic211 [Reply | View]
Check out QEMU. It's still under developement but it allows you to run windows .exe apps directly from MacOSX without the need for Virtual PC. It's based off of wine for linux. Check out http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/ for more info.
-
Universal Portable Laptop
2004-11-24 13:51:48 Alan27 [Reply | View]
I can find no perfect portable that will essentially do almost anything. I wondered about the Powerbook G4 with Virtual PC 7. How well will this work? Any experience out there! Can you access a modern high-speed wireless internet network with the Sierra/Verizon card for example? How does performance degrade under Virtual PC. How fast is switching from one environment to another - PC to OS X and back? I suspect you will have to wait for a Powerbook G5 to make all this happen very well. There is also the issue that this ultimate laptop will cost more than buying a good PC laptop and a decent Powerbook without the additonal memory and software required to run Virtual PC really well. The grahpics card would have to be very good for a portable and decent battery life would be necesssary also. Digital audio/video interfaces are not commonly available on good laptop PCs - I would like both inputs and outputs withotu boxes or dongles/breakout/converters/splitters. -
Universal Portable Laptop
2004-11-25 06:33:49 jkrutch [Reply | View]
You can use the Verizon wireless card with a Mac laptop. There are patches out there. -
Universal Portable Laptop...Verizon
2004-12-08 19:20:27 Raed [Reply | View]
Apple has written a driver for this card
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/verizonbroadbandaccesssupport.html
It works just like you would expect a mac to work. The people at Verizon don't know it though. I downloaded it to use my partners card to see if I wanted one. So when I went into Verizon to purchase one they almost wouldn't sell it to me because they "didn't have the software for it". Educate them. -
Universal Portable Laptop
2004-11-28 14:53:33 Crypto212 [Reply | View]
I have a 12" Power Book G4 and could not be happier as it is light weight, reliable, great for photographic downloads and editing, excellent Firewire support for video input, etc. However, it does not have a PCI card slot so you would need to opt for the 15" to use Sierra/Verizon wireless network cards.
I carry a spare, always charged battery to deal with the long flights plus a power box that works on aircraft power outlets and auto power outlets (formerly known as cigarette lighters).
I run Virtual PC on it for remote access to a corporate network and it has never failed me for wifi or hotel network access connections anywhere in the world. Log onto the network in OS X then start Virtual PC.
Virtual PC loads up and shuts down reasonably quickly. Other than ie and the Java scripts my remote access requires, I do not run PC programs.
Tried to load up some Windows games using Virtual PC for my son on his mac, a bad and disappointing experience given the hardware reguirements of high end PC games. I could not get Rise of Nations to work, for example. Except for my son's game envy, I have not had a need to supplement my program needs with non-Mac software.
Good luck with finding your "universal" solution. I found mine. -
Universal Portable Laptop
2004-11-29 07:45:45 rva1 [Reply | View]
Nearly a year ago I was ready to purchase a new laptop. I am a long time Apple/Mac user and hadn't owned a Mac for almost 10 years, primarily because my company requires us to use a couple of programs that are Windows only.
I knew about Virtual PC, but never used it, but I spoke with a friend who is a Mac consultant and he gave me 2 thumbs up. That was for Virtual PC 6, and it has worked flawlessly. Switching from the PC envirement to Mac is instant. Basically, you are switching from one window to another. Version 6 starts and closes a little slow on my PowerBook G4 1.25ghz with 1 gig of ram.
I have since upgraded to Virtual PC 7. It loads and closes MUCH faster and still works as good, if not better.
To me, it is the ultimate laptop and gives you the best of both worlds. I only use the PC side when I must and everything else is Mac including ALL MS Pro Office products, Mail, iCal, Safari, Quicken, etc...
My PC friends drool at my Ultimate, Multi-Platform, Virus AND Spyware Free, and let's not forget, Beautiful G4. It is truly the BMW of computers! -
Universal Portable Laptop
2004-12-06 03:18:01 shrus1 [Reply | View]
I have been running a 12" Powerbook 867MHz Laptop with VPC 6.1 and yes it does work but the speed is snail paced on Windows based software ( especially in a networked environment). I have recently dumped the VPC and use the Mac at home, I was contemplating going to VPC 7.0 but I do not trust Microsoft enough to make the program efficient or faster. I will be going back to a Windows machine which I suspect is exactly what MS wants to happen.
-
HD
2004-11-29 20:51:33 meding [Reply | View]
Will Tiger be able to support High Definition? -
HD
2004-11-30 08:25:01 galitzka [Reply | View]
I certainly hope so - and quick. The new sony HDV codec is vital to the growth of DV on the desktop, I expect, and hope to see an implimentation in OSX over firewire, and as a type in QuickTime soon. Any word from developers on this front would be most welcome. Also JVCs codec is of interest. How to tackle the large group of pictures in these codecs is an interesting problem - anoyone have a nifty solution up their sleves for this? -
HD
2004-11-30 14:33:12 wadeproduces [Reply | View]
Apple has already announced (in press releases, referred to in posts at random on DV filmmaking sites) support for HDV codecs (both JVC and Sony) in the next version of Final Cut Pro HD, which will be released early next year. In the meantime, you can use FCPHD 4.5 with third party tools to do it (check the bottom of apple's final cut page for a list) Its really not a bad codec-- the file sizes are nearly equivelent to DV, albeit with MPEG-y artifacting on occasion.
-
Where's the support for CD-RW?
2004-12-01 13:50:01 Jaytech [Reply | View]
With the release of Tiger, the fourth update to OS X, you would think that Apple could include support to write and erase CD-RW's. Come on Apple, Windows XP has native support! This is a big deal when you deal with 100's of users, who would like to be able to save to CD-RW's....more than once!!!
-
full screen web
2004-12-04 13:46:10 newtiger [Reply | View]
Most web pages on a Mac do not fill the screen. Mac users have to suffer blank margins or large white areas. PC users do not have this problem. Why is this? Is there hope?
Will Tiger fix this? I got two family members to switch over to Macs and they are beside themselves over this.
Somebody help...Please...Thank you. -
full screen web
2004-12-05 11:11:19 rogre [Reply | View]
PC users would have this problem if they used high resolution settings for their monitors. I think that what you are describing is created from the Mac having higher monitor resolution settings shipping on macs. This is a good thing. Web pages on regular PS settings have larger viewing but they are also of very poor quality and resolution. You can make your Mac web viewing almost as crappy as the average PC by changing to a very low monitor resolution.
Roger
-
Compatibility issue
2005-04-01 11:39:23 romermason [Reply | View]
I want to know if Mac OSX 10.4 (tiger) will work fine on my Powerbook G4 867Mhz with 384Mb of RAM. I am worried about the system running slower, if that is the case, I don't believe I will upgrade. I appreciate your input in this regard.
Thanks





